Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:05 am
I am certain this has been posted already, but NPC's shouldn't have notoriety titles in the paperdoll. This is obviously incredibly minor, but I assume easy to fix.
UO Second Age
A forum for discussion of Second Age UO Shard
http://forums.uosecondage.com/
Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Page 1 of 1
Re: Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:29 pm
this is true
Re: Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:52 pm
Why not especially if they have been on a hunt?
NPCs are people too you know.
NPCs are people too you know.
Re: Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:32 pm
archaicsubrosa77 wrote:Why not especially if they have been on a hunt?
NPCs are people too you know.
accuracy. npcs never had notoriety titles during t2a (or any UO era that i know of, but i stopped playing shortly into UOR)
Re: Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:10 pm
Will fix.
Any recolections on NPC's that were known to have karma/fame, such as nobles?
Any recolections on NPC's that were known to have karma/fame, such as nobles?
Re: Most NPC's shouldn't have notoriety
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:24 am
How about earned noteriety? Has anyone ever kept an NPC long enough for you to know?
A statement was brought up about blue npcs, when guild affiliated they turn green to members...is that accurate being they are hirelings or as mercenaries are they accounted as temporary
guildmates?
A statement was brought up about blue npcs, when guild affiliated they turn green to members...is that accurate being they are hirelings or as mercenaries are they accounted as temporary
guildmates?