UO Second Age

Auctioning off ranger leggings. Bidding will start at 200k. This auction will run for the next 48 hours. Thank you and good luck

Are these new/unused condition when arms lore is used on them?

Yes given all the use this armor is going to get on the battlefield it is important that it is unused

I can assure you that it is unused. as soon as I got it, it went straight to the bank

Ill start the bid at 200k

Thanks for your 2 cents Mens. I'll spell it out for you since you didn't understand the purpose of my question.

*No one wants to get into bidding over 200k on a piece of ranger armor that is trashed and about to fall apart.*

It is hard to have a trashed piece of armor that is new and never used. you are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to auction or sell items as I see fit just like any other player in game. and it is from the Christmas event. it is newbied.

210k

225K

Blaine wrote:Thanks for your 2 cents Mens. I'll spell it out for you since you didn't understand the purpose of my question.

*No one wants to get into bidding over 200k on a piece of ranger armor that is trashed and about to fall apart.*

Yes, of course, because the buyer is clearly going to want it to have a long life on the battlefield given how useful it is on the battlefield.

The other issue is that if it is worn it looks very different because of the wear and tear. I know only some people use ranger armor for aesthetics but they aren't battle warriors like you.

Mens, you are totally missing my point and you also don't have to feel like you need to comment on everyone's forum post because you dont. (Without placing a bid, just trolling)

I will try to get my point across to you one last time....

*I DON'T WANT TO BID ON OR PAY TOP GOLD FOR A PIECE OF RANGER ARMOR THAT IS NOT NEW/UNUSED CONDITION. *

*I have purchased ranger in that past only to arms lore after the fact to see it is beat down. I have no intentions on wearing this armor on the battlefield, that's your own fantasy I guess.

250k

Blaine wrote:Mens, you are totally missing my point and you also don't have to feel like you need to comment on everyone's forum post because you dont. (Without placing a bid, just trolling)

I will try to get my point across to you one last time....

*I DON'T WANT TO BID ON OR PAY TOP GOLD FOR A PIECE OF RANGER ARMOR THAT IS NOT NEW/UNUSED CONDITION. *

*I have purchased ranger in that past only to arms lore after the fact to see it is beat down. I have no intentions on wearing this armor on the battlefield, that's your own fantasy I guess.

I think you are missing the point.

If it isn't used on the battlefield, then it doesn't matter whether it is worn.

If wear doesn't affect the aesthetics, then it doesn't matter whether it is worn.

The point being, what the freak does it matter if it is worn? To you or anyone else?

Very incorrect Mens....here is a quick example.

It's like buying a car to collect for let's say $30k. When you go to pick it up, the car is severely wrecked. And the owner says: "That doesn't matter, you were going to collect it not drive it." The point is....the value of the item is not there if it is damaged.

in b4 taboo's "popcorn" comment.