We should be allowed to place Smalls on top of your Tower!!!
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:53 pm
This was very much possible back then and should be implemented immediately.
Please. (-;p
Please. (-;p
A forum for discussion of Second Age UO Shard
http://forums.uosecondage.com/
I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.
Do you have supporting evidence that it was possible? SS or literature?Ganklord wrote:I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.
Only first hand experience with having one.okgoace wrote:Do you have supporting evidence that it was possible? SS or literature?Ganklord wrote:I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.
It's a lot less amusing when you continue to bring mechanics into question that have been known for an extremely long time without any due diligence.Ganklord wrote:I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.
- Placement of houses enforces a space limit around the newly placed house.
- There must be a completely clear 1 tile space all the way around the building.
- There must be a 5 tile space in the front and back of the house wherein there are no "dynamic" objects. This means that trees and underbrush are OK, but another house is not.
The Town Drunk wrote:Only first hand experience with having one.okgoace wrote:Do you have supporting evidence that it was possible? SS or literature?Ganklord wrote:I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sm ... B466%3B303
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sm ... B499%3B487
This Looks Like Proof, A First Hand Sighting: http://tinyurl.com/c6qpefpKaivan wrote:It's a lot less amusing when you continue to bring mechanics into question that have been known for an extremely long time without any due diligence.Ganklord wrote:I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.
I see your "I haven't seen any proof this wasn't possible"Ganklord wrote:This Looks Like Proof, A First Hand Sighting: http://tinyurl.com/c6qpefpKaivan wrote:It's a lot less amusing when you continue to bring mechanics into question that have been known for an extremely long time without any due diligence.Ganklord wrote:I Haven't Seen Any Proof This Wasn't Possible During T2A.Kaivan wrote:Ironically, you wouldn't be safe if you placed a small on top of a tower. It would make the small house vulnerable. Of course, we can't add in this function here since it was available during pre-T2A.