Page 1 of 1
Dragons
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:34 pm
by Dupre[THG]
They did not have high magery at all thats the whole point of getting a white wyrm because white wyrms hadhigh magery and no firebreath and Dragons had low magery but firebreath which made up for it. so im pretty sure this is correct.
Re: Dragons
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:37 pm
by alatar
Yea that is true, unless the dragon script was edited their starting magery is around 39.4 - 41.5.. as opposed to 88 - 93 for the wyrm.
Re: Dragons
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:58 pm
by Dupre[THG]
bump
Re: Dragons
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:31 am
by Derrick
Dupre[THG] wrote:bump
Why are you bumping this? It not a question. How does this apply to second age?
Re: Dragons
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:45 pm
by Dupre[THG]
Derrick wrote:Dupre[THG] wrote:bump
Why are you bumping this? It not a question. How does this apply to second age?
hehe, cause on second age magery on dragons is HIGH and thats the difference of wyrms and dragons
Re: Dragons
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:55 pm
by do0m
Dupre[THG] wrote:They did not have high magery at all thats the whole point of getting a white wyrm because white wyrms hadhigh magery and no firebreath and Dragons had low magery but firebreath which made up for it. so I'm pretty sure this is correct.
This is true, I was digging through some of my old books and I came across my old "Prima's official strategy guide - Ultima online The second age" which I bought in 1998
It has a monster/beast compendium and I scanned the page with the dragons on it
Re: Dragons
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:54 am
by Alex21
When will the useless regs like "Dragons Blood" be in?
Re: Dragons
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:52 pm
by do0m
never...