Page 1 of 4
Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:41 pm
by Relluc
Now, someone told me these players are just hiding everywhere waiting to stealth into your house or kill your sheep/steal your crap?
I find it hard to grasp that someone could sit online all day and do that...
is it possible we could have a naughty gm on our hands?
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:47 pm
by Mens Rea
Their capacity to undertake the tasks you refer to are founded on the financial and accomodation benefits of the welfare state.
Write to your nearest legislative representative to cut them off at the source.
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:10 pm
by Pacifico
never heard of "CA"
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:11 pm
by Pied Piper
Make sure you use proper security. Use detect hidden in house, lock front door, and use proper lock downs.
If you have heavy traffic going in and out or alot of people with access there could be an undercover cA agent "intentionally" leaving things not as secure as it should be.
Good luck. LOL
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:14 pm
by iamreallysquall
Pied Piper wrote:Make sure you use proper security. Use detect hidden in house, lock front door, and use proper lock downs.
If you have heavy traffic going in and out or alot of people with access there could be an undercover cA agent "intentionally" leaving things not as secure as it should be.
Good luck. LOL
nice insecure tower

<3 cA
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:15 pm
by Pacifico
Relluc wrote:Now, someone told me these players are just hiding everywhere waiting to stealth into your house or kill your sheep/steal your crap?
I find it hard to grasp that someone could sit online all day and do that...
is it possible we could have a naughty gm on our hands?
I'd bring this up to our current guild leader Derri.. i mean AppleJack
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:32 pm
by Atraxi
Relluc wrote:is it possible we could have a naughty gm on our hands?
You must be new here. It won't take you long to learn this, but I'll go ahead and tell you now. This server has the best admin anywhere. They have a very strict rule about no playing allowed for any staff member.
So to answer your question, no it's not possible. It's very IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the case.
I have always had a healthy respect for cA. They don't cheat or haxx. They are just very talented thieves. These guys are very good at finding security weak points and taking advantage of them. You just have to be careful, and never take your security for granted. I did that last week and a member of cA got me for 26k.
I learned my lesson.

Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:33 pm
by Pied Piper
iamreallysquall wrote:Pied Piper wrote:Make sure you use proper security. Use detect hidden in house, lock front door, and use proper lock downs.
If you have heavy traffic going in and out or alot of people with access there could be an undercover cA agent "intentionally" leaving things not as secure as it should be.
Good luck. LOL
nice insecure tower

<3 cA
I don't think towers have feelings. Could be wrong tho.
.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm
by Telamon
.
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm
by Sexy Smithy
Mens Rea wrote:Their capacity to undertake the tasks you refer to are founded on the financial and accomodation benefits of the welfare state.
Write to your nearest legislative representative to cut them off at the source.
This may be the only thing that I have ever agreed with Mens Rea about.
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 pm
by Fede
Pied Piper wrote:iamreallysquall wrote:Pied Piper wrote:Make sure you use proper security. Use detect hidden in house, lock front door, and use proper lock downs.
If you have heavy traffic going in and out or alot of people with access there could be an undercover cA agent "intentionally" leaving things not as secure as it should be.
Good luck. LOL
nice insecure tower

<3 cA
I don't think towers have feelings. Could be wrong tho.
Haha! He probably doesn't understand his mistake either.
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:39 pm
by Hicha
Atraxi wrote:These guys are very good at finding security weak points and taking advantage of them.
The security weak points are usually just the player.
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:42 pm
by Atraxi
Hicha wrote:Atraxi wrote:These guys are very good at finding security weak points and taking advantage of them.
The security weak points are usually just the player.
True
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:47 pm
by iamreallysquall
Fede wrote:Pied Piper wrote:iamreallysquall wrote:Pied Piper wrote:Make sure you use proper security. Use detect hidden in house, lock front door, and use proper lock downs.
If you have heavy traffic going in and out or alot of people with access there could be an undercover cA agent "intentionally" leaving things not as secure as it should be.
Good luck. LOL
nice insecure tower

<3 cA
I don't think towers have feelings. Could be wrong tho.
Haha! He probably doesn't understand his mistake either.
Definition of INSECURE
1
: not confident or sure : uncertain <feeling somewhat insecure of his reception>
2
: not adequately guarded or sustained : unsafe <an insecure investment>
3
: not firmly fastened or fixed : shaky <the hinge is loose and insecure>
4
a : not highly stable or well-adjusted <an insecure marriage> b : deficient in assurance : beset by fear and anxiety <always felt insecure in a group of strangers>
— in·se·cure·ly adverb
— in·se·cure·ness noun
— in·se·cu·ri·ty \-ˈkyu̇r-ə-tē\ noun
Re: Could, CA, possible be some naughty admins?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:50 pm
by Relluc
No, it was not a tower. *scratches head* and the post was to ask about the possibility of them being admins. Thanks for answering. I like knowing that they went through extra lengths to make sure they don't do things like that. Other than players being at fault. I would like to know that there's no other ways to enter peoples homes without the use of a gate or the front door. I find it... a waste of time for me to throw stuff in my house if they can get in there otherwise.
I find it silly that people do this, but that just my opinion. To each their own right?
oh, and.. I must be new? Did my first post give it away?