UO Second Age

in osi i do believe it was one house per Account not per Char i might be wrong here but i think that was how it went

This change was made in UO:R

There is a lot of discussion on this in other forum topics.

are you sure ill look into it but i dont recall 1 house per char

Yeah T2A was 1 house per char. I had only 1 account and used to have a small brick on top of my tower back before they fixed it.
Houses like that were grandfathered so I had it a long time.

ahh the memories....

theidocghost wrote:in osi i do believe it was one house per Account not per Char i might be wrong here but i think that was how it went

Had three houses on Great Lakes with one account.

Good people should fully support 1 per account, or 1 account per person, however.

Anything otherwise would make Mr. Randi unhappy. I couldn't live with myself if I did that.

Cry on the forums please.

If you played T2A UO you would know that a small house in the middle of nowhere, with 50 ratmen spawning on your face every time you log in, cost around 250k at the end of T2A - on Pacific, anyway.

If you want a large house, get saving - or camping IDOCS. Or something.

Or, why don't you start petitioning the real problem which is people who, through fraudulent means, maintain more than their fair share of ACCOUNTS - THAT WOULD SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM AND ACTUALLY HAVE SOME RATIONAL BASIS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCT OF THE RULES OF THE SHARD

Thanks for reading.

You're a very angry man, Mens

Sum_Mors wrote:Good people should fully support 1 per account, or 1 account per person, however.

Anything otherwise would make Mr. Randi unhappy. I couldn't live with myself if I did that.

I'm skeptical that Mr. Randi would care about UOSA housing issues or that he would attach a subjective word like "good" to it.

Ehh I think we already are on our way to reducing housing, and its via era acurate means.

Im trying to cut down to 3-4 houses b/c the co owner change is such a nuisance, its not worth any additional place holder houses. Specially since houses are worth so little here. I think there are more house changes in the horizon too.

I always wonder why people cry about not being able to place a house when they can buy practically any house for 100% markup of deed at the very most??

I believe the issue is that not everyone is as forward thinking as you. One stunningly rich person can own quite a bit more space than one person has any reason of owning, whether they use the room or not. As evidenced by a few threads, most of the time they prefer the latter, and rubbing it in others faces.

Maybe a rule should be added that requires a house to have decoration of some sort. Empty houses whose only activity is a weekly refresh should have a sign posted outside of them with a Neighborhood Charter Meeting type feel to it. Decorate your eyesore or we'll evict you.

Get behind this, GMs.

Siege perilous ruleset would fix this problem.

MatronDeWinter wrote:Siege perilous ruleset would fix this problem.

I long for this day..