I was looking through this..
http://web.archive.org/web/199910081800 ... builds.htm
and found where some of the homes (wood shack, L shape for instance) had a comment about "costing a few more GP than the other (identical size) home.
Are house prices correct?
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
- MatronDeWinter
- UOSA Donor!!
- Posts: 7249
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:35 am
- Location: 你的錢包
Re: Are house prices correct?
I've already brought this topic but never got a reply from Derrick
http://forum.uosecondage.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=16613
http://forum.uosecondage.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=16613
Chesapeake Nov. 1998 — July 2000
Second Age Feb. 2009 —
Second Age Feb. 2009 —
Re: Are house prices correct?
I'm pretty sure thats from when the Shop-types were still available. This could help explain price deviations:
Server update Nov 23 1998 10:59AM
I honestly don't know if any of this happened, too poor at the time to care.
Server update Nov 23 1998 10:59AM
http://wiki.uosecondage.com/?title=1998_Patch_NotesThe numbers are somewhat approximate, because even though the buildings grouped together are extremely similar, they do vary slightly, and therefore may have one or two more or less lockdowns than described below.
I honestly don't know if any of this happened, too poor at the time to care.
Re: Are house prices correct?
I'm sorry i missed that original thread.
I'd be happy to look into this if we could find out more precise info. The variability of lockdowns is pretty intriguing.
I'd be happy to look into this if we could find out more precise info. The variability of lockdowns is pretty intriguing.
"The text in this article or section may be incoherent or very hard to understand, and should be reworded if the intended meaning can be determined."
Re: Are house prices correct?
There were certain homes that had slightly lower/higher prices than their counterparts.