[Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
- BlacKnight
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:58 am
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
would like to see this implemented...
i have had alts killed by Deacon and Sui Juris over and over, they are always blue...
It makes no sense that I have to wait for them to attack me to attack back. How do I win a fight when we both have magic reflect up and they can take mine down and (since they still have it up when they go grey) can cast para or explode combo in as much time as I can take down reflect on them.
Last comment was by GM made Dec 2007, would like to know if this is in the works.
I love PK'S, and i'm not mad at deacon or Juris, because honestly it sucks that they are the only ones to attack me (well, Malice has done well recently), but It would be nice if they were red when they came in so I didnt see the Glorious Lord Deacon and think, "oh I'm sure he isnt a PK..."
i have had alts killed by Deacon and Sui Juris over and over, they are always blue...
It makes no sense that I have to wait for them to attack me to attack back. How do I win a fight when we both have magic reflect up and they can take mine down and (since they still have it up when they go grey) can cast para or explode combo in as much time as I can take down reflect on them.
Last comment was by GM made Dec 2007, would like to know if this is in the works.
I love PK'S, and i'm not mad at deacon or Juris, because honestly it sucks that they are the only ones to attack me (well, Malice has done well recently), but It would be nice if they were red when they came in so I didnt see the Glorious Lord Deacon and think, "oh I'm sure he isnt a PK..."
****************************
Europa 1998-2002
BlacKnight (Knight of Justice, KoV)
Second hand in the Knights of Virtue
****************************
Europa 1998-2002
BlacKnight (Knight of Justice, KoV)
Second hand in the Knights of Virtue
****************************
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
Seconded.benny- wrote:Thanks Derrick...glad to see a shard with staff that will actually hear out their players' ideas...I'm really not used to it =P Anywho, thanks again!
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:28 am
- Location: The Shire
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
Err Deacon has over 60 murder counts, he won't be going blue for a long time. I never attacked people blue unless it was right after I hit Lord before turning perma-red again.BlacKnight wrote:would like to see this implemented...
i have had alts killed by Deacon and Sui Juris over and over, they are always blue...
It makes no sense that I have to wait for them to attack me to attack back. How do I win a fight when we both have magic reflect up and they can take mine down and (since they still have it up when they go grey) can cast para or explode combo in as much time as I can take down reflect on them.
Last comment was by GM made Dec 2007, would like to know if this is in the works.
I love PK'S, and i'm not mad at deacon or Juris, because honestly it sucks that they are the only ones to attack me (well, Malice has done well recently), but It would be nice if they were red when they came in so I didnt see the Glorious Lord Deacon and think, "oh I'm sure he isnt a PK..."
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
I'm not sure of the mechanics, but I thought there was a point when your counts got so high that you wouldn't take a stat loss.
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
I hate it when people make such misinformed remarks :/BlacKnight wrote:would like to see this implemented...
i have had alts killed by Deacon and Sui Juris over and over, they are always blue...
It makes no sense that I have to wait for them to attack me to attack back. How do I win a fight when we both have magic reflect up and they can take mine down and (since they still have it up when they go grey) can cast para or explode combo in as much time as I can take down reflect on them.
Last comment was by GM made Dec 2007, would like to know if this is in the works.
I love PK'S, and i'm not mad at deacon or Juris, because honestly it sucks that they are the only ones to attack me (well, Malice has done well recently), but It would be nice if they were red when they came in so I didnt see the Glorious Lord Deacon and think, "oh I'm sure he isnt a PK..."
Clyde: if ur better than me u cheat..straight up
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
If it wasn't in T2a it shouldn't be there
- kill drizitz
- UOSA Donor!!
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:07 pm
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
it was, which is why its being considered.Sauron wrote:If it wasn't in T2a it shouldn't be there
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
Hate to necro-post, but is it confirmed this will be added yet?
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
i like the idea
but 40 hrs per kill, seems an insane amount of time.
if you have a patch of been a notorious pk, and then decide against it. that character will be idleing for ever to clear his name.
how about 40 hrs from the last kill that sets off red timer? thats almost 2 days?
but 40 hrs per kill, seems an insane amount of time.
if you have a patch of been a notorious pk, and then decide against it. that character will be idleing for ever to clear his name.
how about 40 hrs from the last kill that sets off red timer? thats almost 2 days?
East Britian Bowyer and Weaponsmith
Guildmaster of BoO
Guildmaster of BoO
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:28 am
- Location: The Shire
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
That's what we call consequences for murdering people. Either accept your role as a player killer or don't become one.venox wrote:i like the idea
but 40 hrs per kill, seems an insane amount of time.
if you have a patch of been a notorious pk, and then decide against it. that character will be idleing for ever to clear his name.
how about 40 hrs from the last kill that sets off red timer? thats almost 2 days?
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
so will this also include once youv gone back and fourth from blue to red 3 or was it 5 times you will now be permanently red forever? cause i think that was part of the short/long term thing?
long term counts are good idea, then you can run around red just to get more pvp action without actualyl pking people or takign stat loss
but will some sort of reprieve be offered to peopel with counts who wouldnt otherwise be a pk under this system? duno if there are any..
long term counts are good idea, then you can run around red just to get more pvp action without actualyl pking people or takign stat loss
but will some sort of reprieve be offered to peopel with counts who wouldnt otherwise be a pk under this system? duno if there are any..
<IronfistMax> tell me where you are in game, and ill come thank you personally
Mad_Max: blackfoot you sent everyone to a slaughter
<Derrick> We will not negotiate with terrorists.
UOSA Society of Adventure and History [UoH]
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
i dont think this should be added. the way it is now reds are pks in stat loss with consequences and are the higher lvl of pvp'ers. dying is not an option.
with long terms normal people will be red and water down the purity of murderers.
plus the whole system was meant as a step towards trammel and anti pk / anti social behavior nerfing.
noto pks / blue pks were part of the era. you had to then and shhould now worry about dropping below %50 hps and being fs by an opportunist bue.
don't trammelize the server!
with long terms normal people will be red and water down the purity of murderers.
plus the whole system was meant as a step towards trammel and anti pk / anti social behavior nerfing.
noto pks / blue pks were part of the era. you had to then and shhould now worry about dropping below %50 hps and being fs by an opportunist bue.
don't trammelize the server!
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
I hated long term counts...oddly enough, in any roleplay combat event its always the 'good guys' who give counts. The first time i went red was during a seer event on GL where in no one was suppose to give counts, lol.
Personally, long term counts will force the Bloodrock to decide again...go red, deal with statloss and AFK macroing, and never have town raids....or stay blue, ignore certain 'blue' humans/healers and adjust our roleplay as orcs to account for them.
Then of course, in T2A I believe going red booted you out of Order/Chaos...which was the true reason we stayed blue on GL.
Decisions Decisions.
Personally, long term counts will force the Bloodrock to decide again...go red, deal with statloss and AFK macroing, and never have town raids....or stay blue, ignore certain 'blue' humans/healers and adjust our roleplay as orcs to account for them.
Then of course, in T2A I believe going red booted you out of Order/Chaos...which was the true reason we stayed blue on GL.
Decisions Decisions.
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
you guys kno that rezzing thru stat loss yields a clearing of all murder counts, down to 5, right..? even if yu haev 136 murder counts and die, you can just ressurect, retrain, and be at 5 murders.. that's what i did..
#1 PK Guild on T2A
ironfistmax wrote:Alatar is one of the best PvPers I have known. I have played UO since 1998 and every free shard known to man. It's not questionable whether he is good or not.
Hemperor wrote:Alatar is a douche bag but at least he and cr3w would fight everyone.
Re: [Poll] Should Longterm Counts be Added?
To quote my boss: "Take as long as you need as long as it's done by tomorrow."Derrick wrote: I'll begin work on making this change very soon, but I can't at this time give any estimates as to when this will be added.