Re: Party and Guild Chat System Poll
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:03 pm
That is social engineering...
A forum for discussion of Second Age UO Shard
http://forums.uosecondage.com/
Not really, there is no attempt to influence the population to play in a certain way. If anything, the Fallacy of Moderation applies to my comment.Faust wrote:That is social engineering...
and that's what your argument all boils down to. you can't so nobody else should (actually you can, everyone can, you're just.... well, you know).MatronDeWinter wrote:Some of us, (myself included) cannot run UOAM
Dagon wrote:and that's what your argument all boils down to. you can't so nobody else should (actually you can, everyone can, you're just.... well, you know).MatronDeWinter wrote:Some of us, (myself included) cannot run UOAM
You want to remove/limit UOAM because it was after our time frame that some feature was added, Razor did not even exist, so let's all stop using Razor. I've already given out a client that can be used to connect to UOSA without Razor, and Derrick can block Razor from connecting to the server.. so let's go. What are we waiting for? Era accuracy, right?
Edit: As a side note, I am all for removing razor, but then I suspect the usage of some other program would rise.Kaivan wrote:Regardless of that, because some people choose to use entirely out of game utilities to enhance their gameplay (see: voice communication), we shouldn't make that function available to everyone in game, as long as it was out of era.