Unlimited Bladeworks wrote:MatronDeWinter wrote:a.) I tackle items which personally effect me, as seen by my posting habits. I occasionally research things when I have time in order of which I would personally like changed first.
b.) You simply cannot judge my opinion on one issue based on additional issues that I have yet to post about.
#1) Nice attempt to dodge/spin the issue. Secure trading, checks, Uo razor, unattended macroing etc.. all personally effect you whether you want to acknowledge it or not. Or are trying to say you are segregated from the rest of the UOSA community and these issues don't affect your variety of characters?
#2) I'm not judging you based on one issue. I'm judging you on the totality of your posts under Era Accuracy Forum. Quit trying to manipulate my words as I've already stated this previously. I've quickly went through 15 pages to find only a handful of topics by you, which are all a bit trivial in their nature. <BTW, this only took 10 minutes at best> None of them tackle any of the real issues that do greatly change the UO experience as a whole. So when you use the "T2A accuracy" talking point to further your own personal agenda here I feel obligated to sneeze and say I'm allergic to bullshit. Sorry but you're not slick.
So this is the third time I will ask these questions:
How are T2A rideables adversely affecting the game play in any SIGNIFICANT way? And most importantly.... why is this issue so pertinent, considering the more blatantly obvious, influential inaccuracies that do exist.
Ignore my questions again
, it only reinforces the fact you don't have any good answers....
To sum it up, I find it very hard to take anyone seriously that advocates "T2A accuracy" while ignoring the fundamental problems that immensely change the entire UO experience. Your posting habits and their nature greatly reflect your own invested interests on this server.
The whole "T2A Accuracy" argument loses its validity and credibility when you begin to pick and choose what is acceptable and what isn't. Like I said earlier, you can't have it both ways if "T2A accuracy" is the main crux of your argument. You claim to be against most "T2A inaccuracies" yet there is no substantial proof of this on these forums. All of your topics in this forum are about trivial inaccuracies that "bother" you. Yet somehow you just ignore the obvious inaccuracies that do effect the economy and game play in a considerable way. You can say all you want about getting rid of Razor in this topic etc... but until actually start posting topics that reflect this attitude I won't take you seriously. Simply astounding and disingenuous at best!
Haha,
1.) You are entirely missing the point here. Those issues do effect me, you are correct, but as stated I chose to focus on a particular object that is most important to me at a given time, in an order I deem reasonable. Furthermore, I am not a T2A researcher, those positions fall onto Faust, Kavian, Derrick and many contributions from the community. I am saying that I mearly read/post on topics of my intrest, which I am sure everyone else here does the same.
2.) I never claimed that you judged me on one issue, the idea that you would judge me is asnine, and particularly hard to fathom anyway. The topics that you deem trivial? I assume you mean some of the various bugs I have reported, and skill related issues? I assume you think that because my topics of choice relate to Herding, Enticement, and Ostards that it is rather pointless? You need to accept that other people have greatly different (and more creative) playstyles than your own, and what you find important, others may not agree. I have great uses for such skills, as well as perfectly sound reasoning behind my want for Era-Accurate followers conforming to their rightfull place in T2A. It is era-accurate to introduce these pets into the old lands via a bug, and I do not disagree with that. Whatever I chose to advocate (and certainly do not advocate much), is entirely my choice, and I argue my points with referanced proof in all probability, for my own personal gain. So to answer your question, yes I can pick and chose what I would like to fight for.
The only (possibly) non-t2a item I can think of that you are likely referencing is the runebook-thievery issue, which IS T2A accurate, depending on the time-frame that this server is trying to emulate. Until there is an exact date/time set, you cannot even speak of accuracy, as we are a shard with features ranging over two years.
Whoever this guy above this post is wrote:You can say all you want about getting rid of Razor in this topic etc... but until actually start posting topics that reflect this attitude I won't take you seriously. Simply astounding and disingenuous at best!
Did you even read what I wrote? Are you just one of those people that feel the need to waste bandwith with remedial arguments to defend your internet-ego? It has been stated that we CANNOT get rid of razor, and the only way to limit it's uses is via a server-side change that would REQUIRE the use of Razor to login, which is something that Derrick does not want to approach. Derrick, is in charge here, this is his server, and it is simply a priviledge of ours to play here, did this slip your mind? I am not staff here, I will argue my own points, and if need be (due to consistant public attack) I will point out your mistakes. There is no need to post a topic about razor when several already exist, and the verdict is already in on the matter.
Don't even bother to reply to this unless you do so in the Trash Talk section with a legitimate argument, that shows you at least spent 5 minutes trying to understand the topic, instead of a blantant rage post because I threatened to take away your precious llamas and ostards. (Which we all know, it is highly unlikely to ever actually occur.) I will be more than happy to embarass you there, should you choose.
