UO Second Age

johttenn wrote:

suil wrote:

johttenn wrote:Wow after reading here and doing some googling I hope this is NEVER allowed on T2A, it should be bannable.

Why?

because after reading this thread and doing some googling I hope any third party app with the ability to severely change game play is made bannable here.

What abilities does PlayUO have to 'severely change gameplay?' None? Yep.

ironfistmax wrote:I guess some people would rather win at all costs than have a good competitive fair fight

What is this "fair fight" you speak of? In my experience, it's what the winner is always accused of not engaging in by the loser.

Luminarie wrote:

suil wrote:
Yeah, I've seen my fair share of plugin use over the years on Gamers. It's funny how many people were cheating when there were only about three active plugin developers. That shit spread like wildfire.

I do write my own plugins, but they are nothing 'hackish'...things like agility and strength pot counters, for instance.

But like i said, just because you aren't gonna be doing anything 'hackish' i'm sure theres someone who probably would.

a super troopers quote comes to mind on this.

Ramathorn: "I'm okay... but i can't say the same for these white devils."

This shard's a year old. Nobody's done anything with it yet, and my simply mentioning the goddamn program doesn't mean that anyone will.

It's not allowed there because the UOGamers team has had a lot of problems in the past with cheaters on their shards, which I totally understand. PlayUO has been allowed back on Hybrid, albeit only the newer version which runs through Sallos and does CRC checks of your archives, login tickets, etc. to make sure you're playing legit.

suil wrote: This shard's a year old. Nobody's done anything with it yet, and my simply mentioning the goddamn program doesn't mean that anyone will.

Mentioning it or pushing for the use of it?

i think razor ahs gone too far, no third partys at all! back to click drag your wepon in duels!

Luminarie wrote:

suil wrote: This shard's a year old. Nobody's done anything with it yet, and my simply mentioning the goddamn program doesn't mean that anyone will.

Mentioning it or pushing for the use of it?

I'm saying that I want to use it here. Other players are calling it a cheat program. I am correcting them.

Please stop talking.

BlackFoot wrote:i think razor ahs gone too far, no third partys at all! back to click drag your wepon in duels!

UOAssist, anyone?

Suil, he's being sarcastic...

I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.

johttenn wrote:Suil, he's being sarcastic...

I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.

All I did was ask if I could use it. A bunch of idiots who have never even tried the client cried foul and left me in an awkward position to defend it.

suil wrote:

johttenn wrote:Suil, he's being sarcastic...

I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.

All I did was ask if I could use it. A bunch of idiots who have never even tried the client cried foul and left me in an awkward position to defend it.

I like you sir. High five.

Why would there be such hatred towards the PlayUO client if it was truly a "legitimate client".. Razor has most of the same functions (not all..) and theres no world-wide ban on it.. I could only imagine why so many freeshards (even the one that CREATED it..) have had brief or even permanent bans on this client..

alatar wrote:Why would there be such hatred towards the PlayUO client if it was truly a "legitimate client".. Razor has most of the same functions (not all..) and theres no world-wide ban on it.. I could only imagine why so many freeshards (even the one that CREATED it..) have had brief or even permanent bans on this client..

People think PlayUO is a cheat client because:

• They are stupid and think it comes fully loaded with cheats
• They heard about/saw Krrios' bots at one point or another
• They've heard of plugins and assume that plugin is nerd slang for 'cheat'

It was banned because of certain VERSIONS that were circulating - NOT because the client is a cheat client. If it were, it never would've been allowed in the first place. Please use some sense before you post.

[troll feed]

Just don't use PlayUO and cheat on this shard...you seem to be the only one that thinks that it is NOT conducive to cheating.

Maybe everyone's wrong but you?

[/troll feed]

alatar wrote:Why would there be such hatred towards the PlayUO client if it was truly a "legitimate client"..

That's a circular/shitty argument. "People wouldn't hate on it unless there was something to hate" AKA "the unwashed masses must be right." Please.

I've never used the client and even I can't let that one slide.