Page 2 of 2
Re: Gold Duping
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:26 pm
by Clyde-
Speaking with the most insight onto what happened, not a single one of you has the slightest clue as to what you're talking about. You don't know what happened, you dont know the circumstances, and you don't even know what exactly finalized. Every response i read, when knowing the truth, makes you look like a bunch of bafoons. Typical. Continue your babling, but you're all wrong except for Ragancy.
Re: Gold Duping
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:30 pm
by Roser
So then clyde-, why don't you enlighten the rest of us with your facts?
Re: Gold Duping
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:39 pm
by Border Patrol
Off with his head!!!!!! Justice has been served.
Re: Gold Duping
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:20 pm
by Clyde-
Rose wrote:So then clyde-, why don't you enlighten the rest of us with your facts?
I already told you last night that i will in time. Stop fuming with arrogance and acting as though you know something you don't. Just because i'm in cr3w, and every one of you cannot stand our guild, does not mean we are a group of mindless morons who want to bring down the server. I will leave it at this: NONE of you know any facts whatsoever and to sit here conversing over what went down is completely ignorant. Have some patience.
Re: Gold Duping
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:10 pm
by Sir Trammelite
There are a couple things that should be considered.
1.Was the gold that was duped a material amount? Was the party accused pushing castle deeds out every 10 minutes? I imagine not.
2.There is no statement mentioned anywhere in writing that exploiting a bug results in a ban. There is no clarity on this subject at all, so this type of immediate punishment is unreasonable.
The only fair thing that really remains is to treat it as if the accused party was AFK resource gathering. Confiscate the gold that was duped, or a reasonable estimate that was duped.
Regardless, best of luck to you guys.
Re: Gold Duping
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:35 pm
by Derrick
The situation seems to have been fully contained, and I don't believe that there was any overall negative economic impact at all. The research that went into finding out who was involved was tremendous and thorough.
And I do agree with Clyde- presumptive speculation is not at all helpful.