UO Second Age

NEA

aye apple thats a good argument.

but its soooo anoying to see the same 7 houses for a couple years over and over again if u have played t2a AND uo:R :p

i just hella miss them

Im with arsen on this one! Also they need to make archery worth having as well.

House is already era inaccurate (co-owners, fewer secures, secure weight limits), so that needs to be fixed if we want to continue to argue in these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

Adding a dungeon, Downs, would impact game play, though--way more, I think, than new housing. It increases the landmass (thus making the server seem even emptier), potentially adds new monsters, etc. There's an argument that log houses and villas also affect game play via changing the terrain a bit, but in that case it doesn't add land mass, only alters (in insignificant ways) the way current landmasses are used.

Still, it'll never happen.

ethereal mount for 1000 silver

lol

It's not going to happen, but, yes, one thing I do miss are the stone and marble towers.

Trammel babies demand UOR Houses



Real men demand TENTS




Represent