Mens Rea wrote:In my opinion what Malaikat is saying is that he has insufficient irl friends to fill out a Facebook page...
Case and point.Malaikat wrote:I'm an information security and risk management specialist.
Mens Rea wrote:In my opinion what Malaikat is saying is that he has insufficient irl friends to fill out a Facebook page...
Case and point.Malaikat wrote:I'm an information security and risk management specialist.
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.
Indeed, we have internet. We have social networking technologies. I'm sure any competent aviation risk assessment expert wouldn't avoid flying. But, perhaps, they might be more aware of such risks and for instance book a statistically safe seat. Why take a bus when a flight is so much better.Malaikat wrote:This isn't the eighties, Mens.
Apart from what The Big Bang Theory has brought into the mainstream, the reality of such types of people is far different from the "Hollywood" rendition.Malaikat wrote:Being a geek no longer relegates one to the social fringes.
If I was an idiot I would be right at home in the USA: http://slowdecline.wordpress.com/2007/1 ... s-decline/Malaikat wrote:Now, being an idiot on the other hand...
Of course not. Everyone knows that flying is statistically safer than driving.Mens Rea wrote:I'm sure any competent aviation risk assessment expert wouldn't avoid flying.Malaikat wrote:This isn't the eighties, Mens.
So you're comfortable in making the generalization that anyone who knows a thing or two about computers or network security are socially retarded and hideously deformed?Mens Rea wrote:Apart from what The Big Bang Theory has brought into the mainstream, the reality of such types of people is far different from the "Hollywood" rendition.Malaikat wrote:Being a geek no longer relegates one to the social fringes.
That's a staggeringly insightful piece of journalistic genius. Convicted criminals and the tragically poor are statistically less literate than the remainder of the population.Mens Rea wrote:If I was an idiot I would be right at home in the USA: http://slowdecline.wordpress.com/2007/1 ... s-decline/Malaikat wrote:Now, being an idiot on the other hand...
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.
Depending on what statistics you consider. If you have a mechanical breakdown in a vehicle, regardless of how many individual journeys you take, you are much less likely than if you were in an aircraft suffering a mechanical breakdown.Malaikat wrote:Of course not. Everyone knows that flying is statistically safer than driving.
Well if you had posted articles saying that women unattractive then I could reasonably come to a conclusion that you don't find them attractive, and if you don't find them attractive that you don't use them either.Malaikat wrote:And to follow your inference through to it's conclusion: Who said I don't use Facebook or Twitter?
Yes, quite comfortable.Malaikat wrote:So you're comfortable in making the generalization that anyone who knows a thing or two about computers or network security are socially retarded and hideously deformed?
Except the United States has the highest level of incarceration per capita in the developed world - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarcerat ... ted_States so, there are more "convicted criminal and tragically poor" in the US than anywhere else it would seem. People who aren't idiots aren't these things, right? I also take exception to the assertion that being poor is anything more than an indicator of a person's propensity to commit offences which make them liable to imprisonment.Malaikat wrote:That's a staggeringly insightful piece of journalistic genius. Convicted criminals and the tragically poor are statistically less literate than the remainder of the population.
I'm not arguing with you over your stupid analogy.Mens Rea wrote: Depending on what statistics you consider. If you have a mechanical breakdown in a vehicle, regardless of how many individual journeys you take, you are much less likely than if you were in an aircraft suffering a mechanical breakdown.
You suck at metaphor. I'd have to draw you a map so you could understand your own damn analogies...which, once again, I'm not about to do.Mens Rea wrote:Well if you had posted articles saying that women unattractive then I could reasonably come to a conclusion that you don't find them attractive, and if you don't find them attractive that you don't use them either.
Like I said, you're an idiot.Mens Rea wrote:Yes, quite comfortable.Malaikat wrote:So you're comfortable in making the generalization that anyone who knows a thing or two about computers or network security are socially retarded and hideously deformed?
You're offended that poor people commit more crimes than the middle class?Mens Rea wrote:I also take exception to the assertion that being poor is anything more than an indicator of a person's propensity to commit offences which make them liable to imprisonment.
I think it means that statistics isn't an exact and infallible science.Mens Rea wrote:So does this mean that on a whole Americans are more prone to comitting offences? Or that because they can't read they are unable to live a conventional life in a conventional law abiding way?
You're the one who was trying to make the connection. I'm an American and I'm not an idiot, imprisoned, or poor.Do you think there is a connection between being American, being an idiot, not being able to read, and being more likely to be in prison due to all of these factors, or just one of them?
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.
I hear ya man, but I know my friends and the gamers already know where I'm at.Le Tigre wrote:I also disagree that "people already know I'm a huge gamer" is a reason not to post a status update about the shard. People post about the weather 7 times a day why not do a hey "Secondage is having daily pvp tournys" once every few months.
that makes more senseBlaiseDad wrote:
I hear ya man, but I know my friends and the gamers already know where I'm at.
The vast majority are taking the news like a junkie friend just relapsed.
Maybe I'll ping a couple of the old timers that aren't on the social networks to see if they'll come party.