Re: Prevent IRC Scamming : A Tip!
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:53 pm
And thanks everyone that supports this, but the best support is use of the system. Don't let you or a guildie get screwed.
A forum for discussion of Second Age UO Shard
http://forums.uosecondage.com/
Sounds like a fine idea, and I reverse my stance on this because I hope it would ease the cries Derrick has to hear about stealing. Only reason I can ever steal crap is because some people are lazy anyway. Look at GK's setup at cove if you want to understand security, I am glad my ole buddy lazarith has finally caught on too.Cutpurse wrote:Surprise surprise that the biggest objection comes from the biggest scammer. Yeah, people need to be careful. People need to study who they deal with... but the thing about IRC is that really nayone can pretend to be anyone else.
On the board, it's hard to make a similar-enough-to-scam screenname. See the point we're trying to make, felix? Don't play ignorant, you know you've been circumventing the set rules by using PMs. You're trying to work the system and people following this guideline would basically quash your methods.
Read my suggestion, felix -- not once did I say that staff should do anything to change the rules. I just offered a very logical solution to people getting scammed via PMs on IRC. Make a board post -- it almost makes TOO MUCH SENSE. If this weren't something that should be dictated then there wouldn't be the rules in place that already are.
I hope this really catches on -- so much that MAYBE there will be put in a Transaction Contract sub-forum. If you were a legitimate (read: not a douchebag) then you'd have no problem loggin ginto the thread to say "I agree".
Your example is illegal because that specific deal is struck using the main room. The IRC PM is just a confirmation that someone accepts the terms.Homie wrote:If someone uses the main or the trading channel to get attention for a intented scam or is pming someone whos in the main or trade channel he / she is still abusing the "scam-free" channels for their dishonest plans and should be punished for that reason.Trading should be conducted in #secondagetrade. Perpetrating scams may not be done in the main IRC channel or in #SecondAgeTrade. Save it for ingame or #SecondAgePVP. However don't assume that just because we have this rule people won't try to scam you in channel, but channel bans may be enforced after the fact.
Example:
Im yelling "SELLING +20 VANQ HALLY - 20 K ONLY" in the main channel and we detail the deal out via pm. We meet at a location and i'll give you a might hally instead of a vanq (the propper precautions you should have taken left beside). -> scam that should be punished because i used the main channel to get the needed attention and it makes no diffrence.
I pm you in the main or trade channel with this offert and give you as mentioned above a might hally. -> its still a punishable scam because without the main or trade channel i would never have had the posibility to reach you. You can see.. to scam you i had to use the "scam-free" channels to even be able for a private chat with my victim.
Question:
Is it possible for the staff / IRC-mods to check who pm'ed whom from which channel? in other words: can you see when im opening a private chat from the pvp channel or from the trade channel?
With the given rules i dont see a large range for scams in irc. Maybe a scammer sees it and thinks it would be an extra smart move to not read between the lines and only focusing on the words "main channel" and "trade channel" like an advertisement bot.
This would lead the whole irc rule regarding the scam issue to nonsense and gives the scammer an unfair advantage due to this wooly rule.
I know a lot of players here dont want these restrictions and scamming was and still is a part of this game - ingame.
In this context i would like to know if there were any irc chats like ours during t2a hosted by osi in 1998/99?
*still confused*
regards
Ill give credit where it is due... Felix actually has a good point here.son wrote:
Also IM/IRC/forums existed during era and they were key to make connections and gather information. There was little to no scam enforcing on these mediums. You bet your ass you had to be careful back then.
Possible straw man: Its unfortunate that some of you are putting precautionary responsibilities on admins when they should be your own. Scamming was huge in era and thus should be here too.
The IRC rules are unchanged and are here:Mikel123 wrote:Is IRC scamming now "legal"?
I had thought it was equally protected, just as the trade forum.
We cannot police the rest of the Internet, or monitor PM's on IRC networks, other websites forums, read your email, etc.Trading should be conducted in #secondagetrade. Perpetrating scams may not be done in the main IRC channel or in #SecondAgeTrade. Save it for ingame or #SecondAgePVP. However don't assume that just because we have this rule people won't try to scam you in channel, but channel bans may be enforced after the fact.
yes so did i...Mikel123 wrote:Is IRC scamming now "legal"?
I had thought it was equally protected, just as the trade forum.