Don't break UOSA. Thanks.Anarcho wrote:I would personally be against it as there is much in development planned in the near future, I will do my best to make it as stable as it is but it would be unprofessional to assume so and extend save delaysBudner wrote:I could see making saves maybe every two hours instead of hourly, but wouldn't want to extend it beyond that.
let us brainstorm-
-
Capitalist
- Posts: 11567
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:39 pm
Re: let us brainstorm-
Denis the Menace wrote:Vega for me you are just exploiting the uosa system with your vanq charged spellreflect recall invis pink boobi pvp trammel style which never existed on osi, so stfu.
Jakob wrote:Regardless of douchebag, fair player or Vega.
-
Kublai Khan
- UOSA Subscriber!
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:05 pm
Re: let us brainstorm-
Now I'm super excited! Spill the beans...Anarcho wrote:I would personally be against it as there is much in development planned in the near future, I will do my best to make it as stable as it is but it would be unprofessional to assume so and extend save delaysBudner wrote:I could see making saves maybe every two hours instead of hourly, but wouldn't want to extend it beyond that.
Re: let us brainstorm-
Yeah really, that's some teaser.
Re: let us brainstorm-
I am known to do this too. High Five!Budner wrote:.... leave it strewn all around the Brit bank so cheap bastards like me can scavenge items and sell them.
Inkognito●GM ProvocationLi Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Re: let us brainstorm-
Heh, I don't foresee any crashes but it would be irresponsible to not plan for them.Capitalist wrote:Don't break UOSA. Thanks.Anarcho wrote:I would personally be against it as there is much in development planned in the near future, I will do my best to make it as stable as it is but it would be unprofessional to assume so and extend save delaysBudner wrote:I could see making saves maybe every two hours instead of hourly, but wouldn't want to extend it beyond that.
Standard steps towards further accuracy for the most part.Kublai Khan wrote:Now I'm super excited! Spill the beans...
Re: let us brainstorm-
download/file.php?id=153
That has a server save in there from July 2008, and it's ridiculously fast
(warning: it will make your client crash after a few minutes)
That has a server save in there from July 2008, and it's ridiculously fast
(warning: it will make your client crash after a few minutes)Taboo wrote:News flash, you are weak as fuck and can do nothing to detour me.
You have a cat dancing around mixing a record on your signature. Shut the fuck up farnk.
/next
-
Bixby Legbone
- Posts: 1219
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:42 am
Re: let us brainstorm-
Captain Sparkles wrote:It would be very nice if they weren't so long and frequent. One can practically use the restroom during without worry, so it has that going for it, which is nice.
@Budner, given how seldom the server crashes, us players actually lose more playtime due to the saves! But yeah, I'd rather find a solution that doesn't involve saving less.
While annoying, I agree that it actual serves a useful aspect when you consider that our toons are operated by humans that need to occasional get up and away from the computer.
