Am I still just jealous or can we move on and fix this now

[Eastwood]

Well if vendors in the tents are a result of this thread I would say it was a success.

So no reason to get upset at people who asked this worthwhile question.

[Downs]

90% of the shard is cA or cA fanboys!

congrats on your tent being safe! hopefully this sparks some activity!

[applejack]

First off, chainsoar is BUM and RoB not cA. I let him hang out in #cA because he has a deep sexy British voice that makes me feel funny twixt my nethers. Second, as GM of cA I support these tents, $$$, Brules, Telamon, skinheads etc.

/thread!!!

[Brules]

Well if vendors in the tents are a result of this thread I would say it was a success.

So no reason to get upset at people who asked this worthwhile question.

Vendors will only go back as a result of Derrick's ok. Not this thread. It has been an ongoing thing for quite a while. Derrick stays kind of busy though......

[Light Shade]

Funny that this thread was started by cA and 90% of the commentors are cA or their fanboys (Lightshade and Mike).

You're a bit daft, aren't you?

Paraphrasing Brules - "I don't like what Lightshade said, so i'm gonna create some false affiliations of his and attack those false affiliations that I created out of thin air because heaven forbid I logically respond to the points that Lightshade was trying to make..."

Try logically discussing something instead of calling people names and lying about them next time.

Would the "fanyboys" say this?

What is the "trigger" to remove GM Add-Ons? Truth be told, there is no definitive answer on this. Until there is, this debate will rage on.

All of this having been said, I could care less if the add-ons stay or go. At the very least, they add to the "history" of the shard.

Furthermore, if you dislike the comments about your guild not being active on the shard, then log in and interact with the players on the shard instead of claiming its a crusade.

Your words are wind. Let us see some actions in-game. That's something everyone can support.

-L/S

P.S. Tallying up the people who posted in here, I would say its 7 to 7 as far as cA and their supporters vs. others. 90% is not exactly the number I would use if I wanted to be taken seriously. Let's assume, for discussion's sake though, that the way people voted is what you mean. Then, at the time of this post, ~64.29% of the people are cA and cA supporters at best. If you go by just number of posts alone, you get 17 to 18 from what I see. If you erroneously label me as a cA supporter it still is nowhere's near 90%. So, if you're going to throw out numbers, at least have something remotely logical to back them up with.

[Boondock_Saint]

Someone wrote that we Pirates lost our add-ons.. IT'S TRUE!!!

[son]

I agree with uncle chain

[Brules]

Moar Felix tears!

Vendors are back - thread is moot. PM me if you are interested in running a vendor at the tent!

[Corbin]

Thread is irrelevant anyway if we're striving for accuracy.

Houses and areas that were "blessed" with in game modifications back in T2A by seers remained in game long after the guilds were gone. They became part of shard history and many still remain to this day on production shards.

If we truly strive to accuracy on this shard, then the tent should remain where it is... empty or not.

[son]

lets be honest the best vendors were placed by miller and co a while back

[Boondock_Saint]

Bring back the pirate add-ons! lol