Clarification on Shard Rules?

Topics related to Second Age
Post Reply
Light Shade
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Trammel

Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Light Shade »

Seeking clarification on a possible rule that myself and many other people have no idea of...

We were talking about how a new bard can just create a new character in a slot he wasn't currently using to get a newbie instrument for that character. Intention was to help out a new player.

I was told that my advice and/or tactic was a bannable offense. This is complete news to me...and about 2 dozen people that I happened to talk to after it was brought up said the same thing.

If this is so, I would like to get an official word on this or directed to where said Official Word has been posted. My opinion is that if creating a new character so that you can have a newbie outfit ( or instrument or whatever ) is illegal that such a rule is completely absurd. Its an empty character slot on your account. There is a 7 day timer on deleting any character. Its not like you can break the game with it, so I fail to see the issue.
[20:49] <Affliction> Hey all, are instruments indestructable or not on here? I read on forums they were which suprised me, but also that they weren't...
[20:49] <Affliction> Was just hoping for someone to clarify this for me :P
[20:49] <Lightshade[C^V]> if you start a new character with musicianship
[20:49] <Lightshade[C^V]> you will get a newbie instrument
[20:49] * Infantry (~[email protected]) Quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[20:49] <Lightshade[C^V]> that you can keep if you die
[20:50] <TrojanCow> They cannot be killed
[20:50] <Lightshade[C^V]> and it won't be broken
[20:50] <TrojanCow> The instruments you can on creation are newbied and cannot be stolen either
[20:50] <TrojanCow> *get
[20:50] <Lightshade[C^V]> So if you want a bard, i'd make an extra character with musicianship to get the newbie instrument.
[20:50] <Affliction> Wow... Awesome :)
[20:50] <Lightshade[C^V]> Can always delete the extra character in 7 days.
[20:56] <@Braden> Lightshade[C^V]: You really do want banned.
[20:56] <@Braden> What you are suggesting is against the rules
[20:56] <Lightshade[C^V]> ?
[20:56] <@Braden> Creating characters just to get newbie equipment is a bannable offense
[20:57] <Lightshade[C^V]> News to me, could you point me to that rule somewhere that I can read it?
[20:57] <chainsoar> wtf
[20:57] <Lightshade[C^V]> I am pretty sure half that shard has broken that rule, then, and it should be told to many people.
Anywho, would like a word on this. From talking to people, its obviously something that few are aware of if it is true.

-L/S
Image
[20:08] <@Kaivan> We have a ridable Maahes in Green Acres.
[10:00] <TheBreadman> leeds did a takeover on secondage
[10:00] <@Derrick> hax


Tom: Get bad bro

User avatar
Derrick
Posts: 9004
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Cove
Contact:

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Derrick »

This is not a bannable offense unless it's being done on accounts in excess of the three account limit. The 7(?) day wait on character deletion was OSI's thus effectively our solution to newbie equipment farming.
Last edited by Derrick on Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: err: 7
Image
"The text in this article or section may be incoherent or very hard to understand, and should be reworded if the intended meaning can be determined."

Light Shade
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Trammel

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Light Shade »

Thank you for the quick response, Derrick. :)
Image
[20:08] <@Kaivan> We have a ridable Maahes in Green Acres.
[10:00] <TheBreadman> leeds did a takeover on secondage
[10:00] <@Derrick> hax


Tom: Get bad bro

User avatar
Brules
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:36 pm

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Brules »

Tsk tsk Braden.

Light Shade
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Trammel

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Light Shade »

Brules wrote:Tsk tsk Braden.
Naw, Braden's trying to protect the shard from the bad guys. He didn't mean no harm.
Image
[20:08] <@Kaivan> We have a ridable Maahes in Green Acres.
[10:00] <TheBreadman> leeds did a takeover on secondage
[10:00] <@Derrick> hax


Tom: Get bad bro

Telamon
Posts: 1168
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:39 pm

.

Post by Telamon »

.
Last edited by Telamon on Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Braden
UOSA Policy Enforcer
UOSA Policy Enforcer
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:12 am
Location: Trammel

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Braden »

Aye, sorry for the confusion. I was under the assumption that it would involve the creation in excess of the three accounts. After re-reading what Lightshade said, he said characters, not accounts. Too add to it, I said characters instead of accounts. Oops!

Sorry for the mix-up. :oops:
<Layt> note to self (and others)
<Layt> do not magic arrow braden
<Zebulone> He has inf reflect
<Layt> more like reflect and amplify
<Layt> it was a death sequence unlike any other i had ever seen

Light Shade
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Trammel

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Light Shade »

No worries. :)
Image
[20:08] <@Kaivan> We have a ridable Maahes in Green Acres.
[10:00] <TheBreadman> leeds did a takeover on secondage
[10:00] <@Derrick> hax


Tom: Get bad bro

Stuck
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:25 pm

Re: Clarification on Shard Rules?

Post by Stuck »

Farming newbie gear every 7 days is era accurate. :)

Post Reply