UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Topics related to Second Age
User avatar
Pixelclicker
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Pixelclicker »

The FIRST IPY was really cool. Nice balance on mechanics, intelligent changes, lots of players. It was fun and then all of a sudden it was gone.

However, instead of recreating that coolness, the SECOND (current IPY) is a horrid Frankengame of suck, and I can tell that just by reading the "About" page. All of the following is lame:

"unique names, no mounts, no recall in dungeons, Paladin Class buff items, etc.
Skill Scrolls, NPC Red hunters, and a general feeling of something that is not the UO experience."

This shard has its plusses and minuses, and while it's static nature presents some issues, it's stability outweighs those. Yes, tailoring is useless and archery is nerfed, but it will ALWAYS be like that, and you can plan accordingly. You won't suddenly need to remake your character because "OMG Archery ROX NOW!"

On a side note, do you all remember when that happened on OSI? Archery sucked and hardly anyone used it, then it was the best thing ever and everyone dropped swords for it, then it sucked worse than the first time and everyone dropped it again. Ahhhh, OSI.
<@BoomlandJenkins> I got home, got on UO right away and I knew something was up before I even made it to the spawner, because there were 35+ in the Justice woods and not one person was PKing one another.

User avatar
Downs
Posts: 4102
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Downs »

ya, ipy is bad, their mindset is "No trammell, now with trammell!"
Image
RoadKill wrote: "cA" is a guild of trickery, thieves and explosives so be wary around them.
The New Yew Bank Mall! Don't bother shopping anwhere else!
cA's Database of Adventures!!!

User avatar
Blaise
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2466
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:13 am
Location: Trammel

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Blaise »

Pixelclicker wrote:The FIRST IPY was really cool. Nice balance on mechanics, intelligent changes, lots of players. It was fun and then all of a sudden it was gone.

However, instead of recreating that coolness, the SECOND (current IPY) is a horrid Frankengame of suck, and I can tell that just by reading the "About" page. All of the following is lame:

"unique names, no mounts, no recall in dungeons, Paladin Class buff items, etc.
Skill Scrolls, NPC Red hunters, and a general feeling of something that is not the UO experience."

This shard has its plusses and minuses, and while it's static nature presents some issues, it's stability outweighs those. Yes, tailoring is useless and archery is nerfed, but it will ALWAYS be like that, and you can plan accordingly. You won't suddenly need to remake your character because "OMG Archery ROX NOW!"

On a side note, do you all remember when that happened on OSI? Archery sucked and hardly anyone used it, then it was the best thing ever and everyone dropped swords for it, then it sucked worse than the first time and everyone dropped it again. Ahhhh, OSI.
I remember being able to cast while weilding a bow on OSI. Now THOSE were the days.
Est Sularus oth Mithas

User avatar
Drunk Monk
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:33 am
Location: Bloodrock Fort

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Drunk Monk »

*farts*

hohoho. Uruks lib ere.
“What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal.” -Albert Pike

User avatar
marmalade
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by marmalade »

IPY had 2200+ clients online within the first week or two of the shard coming up because of all the hype. It's dropped alot since then. Not really worth the time IMO.
Image

User avatar
Braden
UOSA Policy Enforcer
UOSA Policy Enforcer
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:12 am
Location: Trammel

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Braden »

Victor Cassella wrote:
Lucien wrote:One thing I just can't understand is: why is their player base so big? Better advertisement, perhaps?

I love UOSA, but I'd like to see it growing!
Now that I am pretty much fully committed to this shard, I'd have to echo that. The more I play here, the more I believe this is a way better shard than IPY, yet they have double the population. Don't get me wrong, 400 clients online does make the world feel alive, but you can never have too many people.

I am sure admins have tried all sorts things to promote the server, and I am sure this topic has been beat to death. But it be worth always attempting to promote the shard and try and reach that golden 1000+ clients online mark. The thing is population brings population, which I believe is why IPY's population does well. Not because its that great of a shard, but because it has always been known to be the biggest free shard.

I'll be donating to this shard, as I know how much it takes to keep these servers running. I'd also be willing to donate separately into some form of affective shard promoting.
We rely on you guys to bring your family and friends to the shard. This is pretty much the method that UOSA has used to recruit people. Maybe in the future we can launch a marketing campaign aimed at getting those whom have never played UO, but for now, we just rely on you guys.

We already hit the 1,000 clients on-line mark a long time ago. Our average clients on-line though is about half that (charts available on the main UOSA website). Regarding IPY, we are not really in competition with them. They have their player base and we have ours. People are, of course, free to go back and forth at their leisure.
<Layt> note to self (and others)
<Layt> do not magic arrow braden
<Zebulone> He has inf reflect
<Layt> more like reflect and amplify
<Layt> it was a death sequence unlike any other i had ever seen

Sandro
Posts: 3906
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: Korea

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Sandro »

Pretty sure UOSA peaked @ about 860 (ish) clients.

Been here pretty much since the beginning and I have never once seen anything above 900.

Unless I missed a stress test, or something..
[14:17] <UOSAPlayer4056> cr3w guild is a joke. Ran by staff members, multi client pking, this shards a joke and a half.
Blaise wrote:Man, you guys are really stepping up your game now that you're not living in the shadow of cr3w

KublaiKhan
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:29 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by KublaiKhan »

Personally I haven't played IPY but I can say that economy means everything in UO. If the economy gets out of hand by selling in game stuff for money staff intervention in a negative way, there goes the server not worth playing anymore. Staff here have perfected the economy of UO better than any EA/OSI ever could IMHO.

User avatar
Faust
Posts: 6247
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:01 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Faust »

marmalade wrote:IPY had 2200+ clients online within the first week or two of the shard coming up because of all the hype. It's dropped alot since then. Not really worth the time IMO.
Did everyone already forget about the Rixus upload of the original IPY where there was a code modfication to the join message that displayed a false player count in the system message? We all know about the massive amounts of corruption that Az conducted with the original IPY ranging from the altered players skills that was flubbed with the 'online player UI' menu to the enet asian girl island rune. Why would that be any different now? He has not registered his shard on JoinUO where the player count would be recorded even after a year of being live despite being told too. This does not necessarily mean the current player count is a lie but based on past experiences it's highly possible.

A person would have to be a complete fool to believe anything over there without some form of hard proof.

Sandro wrote:Pretty sure UOSA peaked @ about 860 (ish) clients.

Been here pretty much since the beginning and I have never once seen anything above 900.

Unless I missed a stress test, or something..
t2ashard.jpg
The answer to that is simple Sandro, 838.

User avatar
Downs
Posts: 4102
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Downs »

Faust wrote: A person would have to be BizzyBeast to believe anything over there without some form of hard proof.

fixed
Image
RoadKill wrote: "cA" is a guild of trickery, thieves and explosives so be wary around them.
The New Yew Bank Mall! Don't bother shopping anwhere else!
cA's Database of Adventures!!!

User avatar
Bicchus Dicchus
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 am
Location: Green Acres

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Bicchus Dicchus »

Dude, if you're looking for a new shard, and you heard good things about two....

Asking both sides' personal opinions on the matter will be a sales pitch no matter who you talk to.

Play one for a week, then play the other; get a taste of each and decide for yourself.

Science not Salesmanship
Image

User avatar
Blaise
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2466
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:13 am
Location: Trammel

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Blaise »

How can one get an idea for the opinions or player base just playing each for a little while?
Getting open feedback on the forums and seeing people not get squelched for speaking highly of another shard, tells quite a lot.

Science often involves research of this nature.
Est Sularus oth Mithas

platypus
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:25 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by platypus »

I've played both UOSA (since a month after launch) and IPY 2 (since launch).

Verdict:
UOSA wins by a long shot

For all you people talking about IPY's population...download the game and log on. 90% or more of the players online at any given time are afk fishers. Its legal to afk fish, and you can sell 20k fish steaks per day to NPCs. x3 accounts, thats 60k per day for 5 minutes work. There's also the skill cap per day, which causes all players to either play the game 24 hours a day OR macro for months/years to get GM in most skills. I was the second GM blacksmith on there, and it took over a month of pure smithing (I mined using macros on the other 2 characters).

IPY2 is definitely broken, so all you UOSA players don't have to worry about the population. Give it a year or so, and UOSA will be at 1k online again once everyone quits IPY. UOSA is still more alive - i.e. players actually playing the game at every hour - than IPY ever was. Not to mention the trammy items/donation shop on IPY. That was the main reason I left...Az created this donation gift shop, where you donate a certain amount and get special rare items/dyes from it. Very lame IMO, and I've always appreciated how the staff here refuses to pander for $.

User avatar
marmalade
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by marmalade »

I was more commenting on the population when IPY came up. There was over 2k clients connected, and every dungeon was full of new characters running around. Regardless of whether the numbers were fixed or not, I've never seen a freeshard that busy. Was pretty amazing at first, but didn't last long. I think once the novelty of running around on a shard full of newbies wore off, alot of people just quit.
Image

User avatar
Vhyx
Posts: 681
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:41 am
Location: Out and about.

Re: UOSA VS IPY 2.0

Post by Vhyx »

I messed around with IPY2 for a couple of days. Enjoyed it about as much as I enjoyed Hybrid (which isn't a whole lot). UOSA wins out for me simply because it provides the feel of the UO I loved the most.
Image

Hythloth Tower for Sale. Contact Boondock_Saint via PMs because it's his and not mine. Azheman will broker the deal, naked.

Post Reply