you should be in government sir.noxmonk wrote:a-blah blah, a blah blah blah blah drop in the freshmen fallacy a blah blah blah
nonsense
you should be in government sir.noxmonk wrote:a-blah blah, a blah blah blah blah drop in the freshmen fallacy a blah blah blah
I took as an argument against my position because I don't speak like a forum retard, thus debasing my position. Mixing insult with debate is, however, never a wise decision. Although colloquially speaking, I would be correct, not that a colloquial term really embodies the the true intention of the original.chumbucket wrote:Your response ignores my main point, ignores the NEUTRAL option and shows a failure to understand exactly what an ad hominem argument is. (An insult is not always an ad hominem argument.) In fairness though, few people seem to understand it.
No one is saying you aren't, or you need to. All I stated was that in all likelihood you and your group have caused more players to leave the shard then join it based solely off of your decisions and actions. There's no shame in saying you're not interested in bring players and would rather make people angry. It's honest if nothing else.chumbucket wrote: I guess I should take my own advice and quit now. Again, there is no reason to respond to these posts: We are era accurate. We don't need to apologize to anyone.
I kind of thought it mightchumbucket wrote:Your response ignores my main point, ignores the NEUTRAL option and shows a failure to understand exactly what an ad hominem argument is. (An insult is not always an ad hominem argument.) In fairness though, few people seem to understand it.
I guess I should take my own advice and quit now. Again, there is no reason to respond to these posts: We are era accurate. We don't need to apologize to anyone.
I bet dollars to donuts this gets put in the trash talk before this time tomorrow!
you jumped on your silly ad hom business because some very valid points were made by both chum and i (but articulated by chum much better .. he is a bard after all) and you had nothing to come back with.noxmonk wrote:I took as an argument against my position because I don't speak like a forum retard, thus debasing my position. Mixing insult with debate is, however, never a wise decision.
I R NEW DONUTS PLZ!chumbucket wrote:
I bet dollars to donuts this gets put in the trash talk before this time tomorrow!
You owe us some dollars, or donuts, not really sure which exactly.chumbucket wrote: I bet dollars to donuts this gets put in the trash talk before this time tomorrow!