maybe some monsters should have backpacks?

For ideas on how to make Second Age a better shard. Can it get any better? Maybe.
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
SkunkDave
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: maybe some monsters should have backpacks?

Post by SkunkDave »

I do do fondly recall being able to get items looted from monsters which had looted players. It was up to you to return the hard earned loot to a whiny dead Blue player.

Also good for a laugh was pickpocketing a monster clean before it was killed and looted... for no reward.

I'm not sure which era this fit into...

User avatar
wgensel
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: South Korea

Re: maybe some monsters should have backpacks?

Post by wgensel »

Monsters currently do loot items from corpses. I guess that means they must actually have a backpack, but I don't really know.

User avatar
Quin the Wretch
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 1:20 am
Location: Brit Gy

Re: maybe some monsters should have backpacks?

Post by Quin the Wretch »

They removed the backpacks just after Third Age. I remember bc at first I liked it bc of less crap to rifle through but then later i missed it. I like that you guys put it back in. Skels had packs also and sometimes some wep or armor piece + ~ 15gold
"I really need to increase my knowledgment" -anonymous

Post Reply