MatronDeWinter wrote:That was simply a few typos in the official patch notes.
Has it been documented as a typo or are you saying it was a typo?
MatronDeWinter wrote:That was simply a few typos in the official patch notes.
Obviously google chat, because someone's opinion during the era is null, void, invalid, and irrelevant. I read it on the internet so it must be true.DarkWing wrote:so who are we to believe? some google chat forum? or the guy that was There?
Hicha wrote:Obviously google chat, because someone's opinion during the era is null, void, invalid, and irrelevant. I read it on the internet so it must be true.DarkWing wrote:so who are we to believe? some google chat forum? or the guy that was There?
I have no idea about the snooping thing (I remember it being that way for a short time and then promptly fixed, but it does unfortunately look like our "era" falls on those mechanics of t2a though), clearly I am not Ralph Koster. I just meant to prove that his "But we have this guy, who said he wrote the essay, and he knows for sure that it worked this way" is not a valid source.Karik Verlee wrote:MatronDeWinter wrote:That was simply a few typos in the official patch notes.
Has it been documented as a typo or are you saying it was a typo?
nor does it say the opposite, says nothing about NOT being able to Detect Perma GreyMatronDeWinter wrote:
Prove me wrong.
Since you specifically said "nothing official", I would like to add that nowhere in the patch notes does it say anything about forensics detecting perma-grey status. http://www.stratics.com is not "official" or in any way affiliated with Origin/EA. Almost all of the content was added by players, much in the same way you can contribute to wikipedia.com.
Seriously?DarkWing wrote: nor does it say the opposite, says nothing about NOT being able to Detect Perma Grey
YUP Seriously!MatronDeWinter wrote:Seriously?DarkWing wrote: nor does it say the opposite, says nothing about NOT being able to Detect Perma Grey
Argument ad Ignorantiam