CTF Rule Adjustment

For ideas on how to make Second Age a better shard. Can it get any better? Maybe.
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.

Implement said rules?

Poll ended at Sun May 30, 2010 4:18 am

Yes
14
58%
No
10
42%
 
Total votes: 24

Sandro
Posts: 3906
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: Korea

CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Sandro »

Briefly stated.
  • Add friendly fire to AoE spells (EQ / Pots / MS)
  • Remove Free Use ( People just spam refresh pots all day, no strategy req.)
  • Add more user-friendly spells ( teleport, field spells, etc)
Poll will run for 10 days.

As it stands now, its incredibly easy to win a CTF, just by guarding your teams base when holding an enemy flag. You can spam earthquake, and because there's no friendly fire, 95% of the time your team will win the defense.

Also, there is disappointingly no strategy involved what-so-ever in CTF. With the ability to continuously spam refresh pots, people can never be "wall-blocked". The restriction on most field spells (especially para-field) is also a big hinder to this strategy. I feel that the removal of free-use will bring strategy and resource management to the CTF events.

Constructive feedback plz.
Last edited by Sandro on Thu May 20, 2010 5:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
[14:17] <UOSAPlayer4056> cr3w guild is a joke. Ran by staff members, multi client pking, this shards a joke and a half.
Blaise wrote:Man, you guys are really stepping up your game now that you're not living in the shadow of cr3w

Pro
Posts: 3096
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Uganda

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Pro »

imo remove pots/eq then add teleport
Image

Sandro
Posts: 3906
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: Korea

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Sandro »

How should we work out the non-returning flags? It gets rather dull when someone has the same flag the entire 20/30 minutes, etc.

Maybe we could adjust it to where the flag has to be "returned" to its base after <said time> has elapsed in order for the team holding it to capture it, that way you can't just turtle the flag for 30 minutes each game..
[14:17] <UOSAPlayer4056> cr3w guild is a joke. Ran by staff members, multi client pking, this shards a joke and a half.
Blaise wrote:Man, you guys are really stepping up your game now that you're not living in the shadow of cr3w

User avatar
Corbin
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:18 am

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Corbin »

I'm torn on the friendly fire. I think it would be better to disable area spells like EQ in CTF all together rather than adding a friendly fire. It's hard enough to click running targets as it is.

I'm all for removing free use so long as the items used in CTF are replaced at the end of the game. Meaning I walk into CTF with 10 bandies, use all 10 during the game so I have effectively "run out", and those 10 bandies are given back at the end of the game when I am back in the sign up area.

I think teleport would be a bad spell to add though. Too many ways to abuse it.
Image
Pacific (98-02) - Mystic of FL
Catskills (03-08) - Roo Avery of VIT, T^B
UOSA - Amos Trask/Roo Avery of WTC

Sandro
Posts: 3906
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: Korea

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Sandro »

I suggested adding teleport to counter taking away unlimited refresh pots. That way you can form a player-wall to block runners, but still have the ability to counter such tactics without it being unbalanced.

Thoughts?

Possibly enable infinite hunger like in tournaments perhaps?
[14:17] <UOSAPlayer4056> cr3w guild is a joke. Ran by staff members, multi client pking, this shards a joke and a half.
Blaise wrote:Man, you guys are really stepping up your game now that you're not living in the shadow of cr3w

User avatar
Kabal
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:08 pm
Location: South of Skara Brae

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Kabal »

I voted yes on the poll, but I think there should be free reg use to allow noobs to play but no free potion use cuz thats a crutch. Explosion potions arent free use, why all the other ones?
Derrick wrote: . . .get real please.
"F**k that Morpheus, I'm takin' em both!" -Kabal
*pm me with questions about lasers*

Sandro
Posts: 3906
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: Korea

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Sandro »

It's called resource management. If you enter the CTF and cast 255 mini-heals then obviously you will run out of regs..

keyword = management..

How about removing free-use and adding the "bank opening" on each "resurrection spawn" That way you can still re-up on supplies if you don't know what management means..

Thoughts?
[14:17] <UOSAPlayer4056> cr3w guild is a joke. Ran by staff members, multi client pking, this shards a joke and a half.
Blaise wrote:Man, you guys are really stepping up your game now that you're not living in the shadow of cr3w

Luca|Blight
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:25 am

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Luca|Blight »

Keep free use.

Add Poison/Para/Fire Fields.

Friendly fire seems counter-productive. I would personally kill people on my team that I don't like if it was implemented.

User avatar
Kabal
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:08 pm
Location: South of Skara Brae

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Kabal »

Sandro wrote:keyword = management..


Thoughts?
What about noobs who dont have a ton of regs?
New question, should people with half built characters or limited resources be excluded?
Derrick wrote: . . .get real please.
"F**k that Morpheus, I'm takin' em both!" -Kabal
*pm me with questions about lasers*

Sandro
Posts: 3906
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: Korea

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Sandro »

Kabal wrote:What about noobs who dont have a ton of regs?
New question, should people with half built characters or limited resources be excluded?
People who are new could opt- to play a dexxer in such events, bandages are extremely easy to acquire, and it really doesn't take 1000/ea reg to participate in these events. People are use to spamming any/all spells without any thought because they know it doesn't consume resources.

We had this same discussion about 1v1 tournaments, and free-use was disabled, and the tournaments are better than ever. Resource management is a huge factor in the 1v1's now, and you are still able to re-up your stock at the beginning of each round. We could classify a "round" in CTF in terms of deaths, you can bank on a re-spawn, if necessary.
[14:17] <UOSAPlayer4056> cr3w guild is a joke. Ran by staff members, multi client pking, this shards a joke and a half.
Blaise wrote:Man, you guys are really stepping up your game now that you're not living in the shadow of cr3w

User avatar
Kabal
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:08 pm
Location: South of Skara Brae

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Kabal »

Sandro wrote:We had this same discussion about 1v1 tournaments, and free-use was disabled, and the tournaments are better than ever. Resource management is a huge factor in the 1v1's now, and you are still able to re-up your stock at the beginning of each round. We could classify a "round" in CTF in terms of deaths, you can bank on a re-spawn, if necessary.
You should add this to the original bullets list.
Derrick wrote: . . .get real please.
"F**k that Morpheus, I'm takin' em both!" -Kabal
*pm me with questions about lasers*

Luca|Blight
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:25 am

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Luca|Blight »

Sandro wrote:
Kabal wrote: We had this same discussion about 1v1 tournaments, and free-use was disabled, and the tournaments are better than ever. Resource management is a huge factor in the 1v1's now, and you are still able to re-up your stock at the beginning of each round. We could classify a "round" in CTF in terms of deaths, you can bank on a re-spawn, if necessary.
Tournaments are worse then ever. There's no resource management in them, you just stock 200 of each reg and a hally. It just makes it annoying.

GomerPyle
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:22 am

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by GomerPyle »

Luca|Blight wrote:Tournaments are worse then ever. There's no resource management in them, you just stock 200 of each reg and a hally. It just makes it annoying.

Hicha
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2264
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:03 am
Location: out selling permits

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Hicha »

Option 3: Remove CTF
Image
"I consider most of you NPC's that inhabit the single player game that I am here to enjoy." - MatronDeWinter

User avatar
Psilo
Posts: 1411
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: CTF Rule Adjustment

Post by Psilo »

I dislike CTF and other automated events but I agree with Sandro's proposed changes.

If we can't have 100% friendly fire, then I think we should at least have EQ/field spells hurt everyone. You can't abuse it, cause there's no way someone will die from field spells and EQ hits everyone on the screen so you and 14 other people are gonna be spamming gheal anyway.

Also, I think teleport won't be abused....I think red pot spamming is worse. With teleport it takes time to cast and aim as well as being able to be interrupted with harm/debuffs. Unlimited red pots makes it way easier cause you can run through 10 people instantly with little risk of dying and giving points to the other team.

Post Reply