What abilities does PlayUO have to 'severely change gameplay?' None? Yep.johttenn wrote:because after reading this thread and doing some googling I hope any third party app with the ability to severely change game play is made bannable here.suil wrote:Why?johttenn wrote:Wow after reading here and doing some googling I hope this is NEVER allowed on T2A, it should be bannable.
Considering playing here
Re: Considering playing here
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:36 am
Re: Considering playing here
What is this "fair fight" you speak of? In my experience, it's what the winner is always accused of not engaging in by the loser.ironfistmax wrote:I guess some people would rather win at all costs than have a good competitive fair fight
Re: Considering playing here
This shard's a year old. Nobody's done anything with it yet, and my simply mentioning the goddamn program doesn't mean that anyone will.Luminarie wrote:suil wrote:
Yeah, I've seen my fair share of plugin use over the years on Gamers. It's funny how many people were cheating when there were only about three active plugin developers. That shit spread like wildfire.
I do write my own plugins, but they are nothing 'hackish'...things like agility and strength pot counters, for instance.
But like i said, just because you aren't gonna be doing anything 'hackish' i'm sure theres someone who probably would.
a super troopers quote comes to mind on this.
Ramathorn: "I'm okay... but i can't say the same for these white devils."
Re: Considering playing here
It's not allowed there because the UOGamers team has had a lot of problems in the past with cheaters on their shards, which I totally understand. PlayUO has been allowed back on Hybrid, albeit only the newer version which runs through Sallos and does CRC checks of your archives, login tickets, etc. to make sure you're playing legit.
Re: Considering playing here
Mentioning it or pushing for the use of it?suil wrote: This shard's a year old. Nobody's done anything with it yet, and my simply mentioning the goddamn program doesn't mean that anyone will.
Luminarie
Re: Considering playing here
i think razor ahs gone too far, no third partys at all! back to click drag your wepon in duels!

<IronfistMax> tell me where you are in game, and ill come thank you personally
Mad_Max: blackfoot you sent everyone to a slaughter
<Derrick> We will not negotiate with terrorists.
UOSA Society of Adventure and History [UoH]
Re: Considering playing here
I'm saying that I want to use it here. Other players are calling it a cheat program. I am correcting them.Luminarie wrote:Mentioning it or pushing for the use of it?suil wrote: This shard's a year old. Nobody's done anything with it yet, and my simply mentioning the goddamn program doesn't mean that anyone will.
Please stop talking.
Re: Considering playing here
UOAssist, anyone?BlackFoot wrote:i think razor ahs gone too far, no third partys at all! back to click drag your wepon in duels!
Re: Considering playing here
Suil, he's being sarcastic...
I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.
I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.
Re: Considering playing here
All I did was ask if I could use it. A bunch of idiots who have never even tried the client cried foul and left me in an awkward position to defend it.johttenn wrote:Suil, he's being sarcastic...
I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.
Re: Considering playing here
I like you sir. High five.suil wrote:All I did was ask if I could use it. A bunch of idiots who have never even tried the client cried foul and left me in an awkward position to defend it.johttenn wrote:Suil, he's being sarcastic...
I think you are doing nothing for your own cause and helping a shard-wide consensus against allowing PlayUO form.
Re: Considering playing here
Why would there be such hatred towards the PlayUO client if it was truly a "legitimate client".. Razor has most of the same functions (not all..) and theres no world-wide ban on it.. I could only imagine why so many freeshards (even the one that CREATED it..) have had brief or even permanent bans on this client..
#1 PK Guild on T2A
ironfistmax wrote:Alatar is one of the best PvPers I have known. I have played UO since 1998 and every free shard known to man. It's not questionable whether he is good or not.
Hemperor wrote:Alatar is a douche bag but at least he and cr3w would fight everyone.
Re: Considering playing here
People think PlayUO is a cheat client because:alatar wrote:Why would there be such hatred towards the PlayUO client if it was truly a "legitimate client".. Razor has most of the same functions (not all..) and theres no world-wide ban on it.. I could only imagine why so many freeshards (even the one that CREATED it..) have had brief or even permanent bans on this client..
- They are stupid and think it comes fully loaded with cheats
- They heard about/saw Krrios' bots at one point or another
- They've heard of plugins and assume that plugin is nerd slang for 'cheat'
Re: Considering playing here
[troll feed]
Just don't use PlayUO and cheat on this shard...you seem to be the only one that thinks that it is NOT conducive to cheating.
Maybe everyone's wrong but you?
[/troll feed]
Just don't use PlayUO and cheat on this shard...you seem to be the only one that thinks that it is NOT conducive to cheating.
Maybe everyone's wrong but you?
[/troll feed]
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:36 am
Re: Considering playing here
That's a circular/shitty argument. "People wouldn't hate on it unless there was something to hate" AKA "the unwashed masses must be right." Please.alatar wrote:Why would there be such hatred towards the PlayUO client if it was truly a "legitimate client"..
I've never used the client and even I can't let that one slide.