SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
derrick should test it out for a week if anything changes keep it if not oh well no more complaints because we tried your way and it didnt work.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Vlastslav wrote:Im glad your the guild cheerleader, but im sure people can speak for themselves. You don't even know what the argument is, as you've stated previously in this thread.
I've never stated that I had no clue what the argument was, I said I don't understand why the people are crying, because events really don't do shit. It's not going to mean more people to steal from, as they'll prolly still be in their houses. It will not mean more field PvP. The only aspect I can see it improving is Pking, but even then it'll matter very little.
So it brings me yet to my original point.. wtf is your point? Tournies take too long!? Great.
(10:15:37 AM) mark: wana pk?
(10:15:41 AM) Cataclysm: all mine are dead, sigh
(10:15:44 AM) Cataclysm: thank weezy for one, spanky for the other
(10:15:49 AM) Cataclysm: and a dc for the third
(10:15:57 AM) mark: why u shouldnt team with ethnics
(10:15:41 AM) Cataclysm: all mine are dead, sigh
(10:15:44 AM) Cataclysm: thank weezy for one, spanky for the other
(10:15:49 AM) Cataclysm: and a dc for the third
(10:15:57 AM) mark: why u shouldnt team with ethnics
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Limiting and removing events is not an instant thing. It is a slow process to change the falsely induced playstyle of the population. It has to be done right or else it wont work. The shard must slowly remove tourneys over a few weeks time to get them back to weekends. This will also help players get back to the real UO. Events like ctf and dd should be limited to once a day, then every other day, then once every 3 days, then removed... or something of that nature. I'm sure if anyone has a plan for the goodness of the shard its Derrick.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
a lot of trophies at 15k/ea are given out everyday. most of them to these pvpers... ezy money...BlackFoot wrote:...
15 players out of the real world out of 350 ips. for twenty minutes + 4 guys. Will keep trackign todays activity.
keep the tournaments and get rid of the trophies. let people enter for fun and fun only. atm they are just another "policy" decision that heavily favors those 1337 pee-vee-pee guys.
but this thread is a dead horse kicked. and i don't think we will see a change anytime soon.
Gunslinger wrote:The reason they will not get rid of these "trammelized events" is because of the fear of losing players. Too many players ride on tourney ego's and trophy point marketing.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
There are plenty of events players can get trophys without having to l33t pvp. Although being good at the non pvp events increaes your odds of success just the same as being good at pvp events increases your odds of scuccess.

<IronfistMax> tell me where you are in game, and ill come thank you personally
Mad_Max: blackfoot you sent everyone to a slaughter
<Derrick> We will not negotiate with terrorists.
UOSA Society of Adventure and History [UoH]
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
easy money atm. pvm is pointless if you can win tournaments.

- Stealthmode
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:12 am
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
I think all the arguments against events have been laid out pretty clearly already.
The no-risk playstyle is what I came here to avoid. Trophy points are the center of the server economy and completely innacurate. Forcing players to put up with extremely irritating changes in the name of era accuracy is already a tough pill to swallow, but atleast I came here knowing to expect that. Events feel like you are rubbing it in my face that I don't play to pvp. Events do a lot to kill player interaction and blah blah blah.
Events suck.
The no-risk playstyle is what I came here to avoid. Trophy points are the center of the server economy and completely innacurate. Forcing players to put up with extremely irritating changes in the name of era accuracy is already a tough pill to swallow, but atleast I came here knowing to expect that. Events feel like you are rubbing it in my face that I don't play to pvp. Events do a lot to kill player interaction and blah blah blah.
Events suck.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Said the guy who bragged of mining with 3+ clients at a time and supports AFK groups of archer bots insta-killing people.Vlastslav wrote:My opinion is to remove or limit events so people will log on and enjoy the game the way it was supposed to be played.
You have lost a fair amount of credibility.

[22:26] <ian> why am i making 3750 empty kegs
[22:27] <ian> 1125000 for 3750 empty kegs
----------------------------------------
[10:44] <ian> a good cat is a dead cat
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
you mean you didnt have 3 accounts all running at the same time back in the day? LOL QUIT LIVING IN THE PAST NOOB.Hemperor wrote:Said the guy who bragged of mining with 3+ clients at a time and supports AFK groups of archer bots insta-killing people.
You have lost a fair amount of credibility.
btw that was extreme sarcasm.. you know where i stand.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Automated events are an anomaly on this shard. They detract from the actual game by deterring players from the normal content, siphoning them off of the map, and destroying the atmosphere of the game.
Ultima Online is supposed to have real risk, real reward, and most importantly, real consequences.
Ultima Online is supposed to have real risk, real reward, and most importantly, real consequences.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Exactly my thoughts.Hemperor wrote:Said the guy who bragged of mining with 3+ clients at a time and supports AFK groups of archer bots insta-killing people.Vlastslav wrote:My opinion is to remove or limit events so people will log on and enjoy the game the way it was supposed to be played.
You have lost a fair amount of credibility.

Syntax of the Wolfpack (TW) - PVP Since 97'
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
x2Mirage wrote:Exactly my thoughts.
http://my.uosecondage.com/Status/Guild/21[/color][/center]
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
dunno why i should need to enter any event for some ezy trophy moniez at all... once again: let events be for fun and fun only...BlackFoot wrote:There are plenty of events players can get trophys without having to l33t pvp. Although being good at the non pvp events increaes your odds of success just the same as being good at pvp events increases your odds of scuccess.
you are into pixels, you wouldn't like this change it. i understand that.
btw. multi-login is another one of these policy decision that favors a pvp-style, because it makes stateloss a lot less severe than it was back in the days... but let's discuss it in another thread, because that is another topic: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=15022&sid=78cfc0fa ... 911067a6c0Hemperor wrote:Said the guy who bragged of mining with 3+ clients at a time and supports AFK groups of archer bots insta-killing people.Vlastslav wrote:My opinion is to remove or limit events so people will log on and enjoy the game the way it was supposed to be played.
You have lost a fair amount of credibility.
Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED
Obviously Tg just wants everyone to fight them in there town so they can househide and use their archer bots not fooling anyone nice try though