SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Topics related to Second Age

Should events be limited or removed?

Yes, remove all events and all tournaments.
23
33%
Yes, remove all events but some tournaments on the weekends.
0
No votes
Yes, reduce the amount of events and tournaments per week.
13
19%
No, I enjoy the current system of events and tournaments.
33
48%
 
Total votes: 69

benny-
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:58 am

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by benny- »

The whole argument of "if you don't like it don't participate" is weak.
They've participated in events, they know they can't win them.. thats like the entire reason for it.
That's downright idiotic.

This has nothing to do with people simply not liking or enjoying the events, nor is the majority of people who voted here simply bad at these events and thus, out of spite, want them removed.

Simply put, what made UO great was that it allowed the players to do whatever they wanted, but as the players did as they pleased, it created conflict and interaction.

The events here distract from the regular gameplay, by taking a decent portion of the online/active players, taking them out of the regular world, to a different map, to where they can contend in a game completely separate from the rest of the playerbase.

Pvmers, newbies, pks, anti's...all manner of players are taken out of the game world to occupy themselves in something else entirely. As such you see diminished activity during events.

This is not about being able to find field action, it is a distraction that detracts from the entire game.

When you compound this, taking into account the amount of time that each event takes up, the fact that they're run multiple times a day, throughout the day, and held every single day of the week, then I think it is a valid argument to say that these do in fact detract from the actual gameplay of the server.

The events here have nothing to do with the era. Bagball? Capture the flag? What does these have to do with Ultima?

Slowly phase out events, add some content here and there to spice things up, and allow players to go back to creating their own fun.

Just like it was in the era.
- Elisud

User avatar
punk
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:37 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by punk »

benny- wrote:The whole argument of "if you don't like it don't participate" is weak.
They've participated in events, they know they can't win them.. thats like the entire reason for it.
That's downright idiotic.

This has nothing to do with people simply not liking or enjoying the events, nor is the majority of people who voted here simply bad at these events and thus, out of spite, want them removed.

Simply put, what made UO great was that it allowed the players to do whatever they wanted, but as the players did as they pleased, it created conflict and interaction.

The events here distract from the regular gameplay, by taking a decent portion of the online/active players, taking them out of the regular world, to a different map, to where they can contend in a game completely separate from the rest of the playerbase.

Pvmers, newbies, pks, anti's...all manner of players are taken out of the game world to occupy themselves in something else entirely. As such you see diminished activity during events.

This is not about being able to find field action, it is a distraction that detracts from the entire game.

When you compound this, taking into account the amount of time that each event takes up, the fact that they're run multiple times a day, throughout the day, and held every single day of the week, then I think it is a valid argument to say that these do in fact detract from the actual gameplay of the server.

The events here have nothing to do with the era. Bagball? Capture the flag? What does these have to do with Ultima?

Slowly phase out events, add some content here and there to spice things up, and allow players to go back to creating their own fun.

Just like it was in the era.
Bagball has everything to do with Ultima, it is ultimas game!
Erik [Hu]

benny-
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:58 am

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by benny- »

Stand corrected.

However, point still stands...these events have nothing to do with the era.
- Elisud

Lord Cavewight of GL
Posts: 1629
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:26 am

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Lord Cavewight of GL »

benny- wrote:Stand corrected.

However, point still stands...these events have nothing to do with the era.
Era accuracy isn't important if people can make money off some silly custom addition. :(

Vlastslav
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:39 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Vlastslav »

punk wrote:
benny- wrote:The whole argument of "if you don't like it don't participate" is weak.
They've participated in events, they know they can't win them.. thats like the entire reason for it.
That's downright idiotic.

This has nothing to do with people simply not liking or enjoying the events, nor is the majority of people who voted here simply bad at these events and thus, out of spite, want them removed.

Simply put, what made UO great was that it allowed the players to do whatever they wanted, but as the players did as they pleased, it created conflict and interaction.

The events here distract from the regular gameplay, by taking a decent portion of the online/active players, taking them out of the regular world, to a different map, to where they can contend in a game completely separate from the rest of the playerbase.

Pvmers, newbies, pks, anti's...all manner of players are taken out of the game world to occupy themselves in something else entirely. As such you see diminished activity during events.

This is not about being able to find field action, it is a distraction that detracts from the entire game.

When you compound this, taking into account the amount of time that each event takes up, the fact that they're run multiple times a day, throughout the day, and held every single day of the week, then I think it is a valid argument to say that these do in fact detract from the actual gameplay of the server.

The events here have nothing to do with the era. Bagball? Capture the flag? What does these have to do with Ultima?

Slowly phase out events, add some content here and there to spice things up, and allow players to go back to creating their own fun.

Just like it was in the era.
Bagball has everything to do with Ultima, it is ultimas game!
This is the argument, nice post dude hopefully Derrick reads it.
Last edited by Vlastslav on Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
marmalade
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by marmalade »

benny- wrote:The whole argument of "if you don't like it don't participate" is weak.
They've participated in events, they know they can't win them.. thats like the entire reason for it.
That's downright idiotic.

This has nothing to do with people simply not liking or enjoying the events, nor is the majority of people who voted here simply bad at these events and thus, out of spite, want them removed.

Simply put, what made UO great was that it allowed the players to do whatever they wanted, but as the players did as they pleased, it created conflict and interaction.

The events here distract from the regular gameplay, by taking a decent portion of the online/active players, taking them out of the regular world, to a different map, to where they can contend in a game completely separate from the rest of the playerbase.

Pvmers, newbies, pks, anti's...all manner of players are taken out of the game world to occupy themselves in something else entirely. As such you see diminished activity during events.

This is not about being able to find field action, it is a distraction that detracts from the entire game.

When you compound this, taking into account the amount of time that each event takes up, the fact that they're run multiple times a day, throughout the day, and held every single day of the week, then I think it is a valid argument to say that these do in fact detract from the actual gameplay of the server.

The events here have nothing to do with the era. Bagball? Capture the flag? What does these have to do with Ultima?

Slowly phase out events, add some content here and there to spice things up, and allow players to go back to creating their own fun.

Just like it was in the era.
this post makes me want to say stop events completely.
Image

Pro
Posts: 3096
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Uganda

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Pro »

Change the way tourneys are run imo have the gm's still give statue prizes but have them hosted in a player area, or hosted by a player, maybe someone canadian who owns a museum...
Image

BlackFoot
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 7668
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:33 am
Location: Canada

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by BlackFoot »

all player ran events Ive hosted involving pvp admin have been more than willing to create awesome prizes for. Unfortunately, not many players are willing to participate in player ran events. That didn't change when events were removed before.
Image
<IronfistMax> tell me where you are in game, and ill come thank you personally
Mad_Max: blackfoot you sent everyone to a slaughter
<Derrick> We will not negotiate with terrorists.
UOSA Society of Adventure and History [UoH]

tekai
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1153
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:11 am

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by tekai »

That is becuase the events are stupid becuase of bards.

Quick! beat the cheating EUO People to grabbing the trophies! for 3 hours!

Sooooo much fun....
[broken image]

User avatar
Corbin
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:18 am

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Corbin »

Yes, because there were no admin run events on production shards... oh wait, yes there was.

They were called Seers, and they were very active in making events, several times a week actually. Granted, they were different types of events than the ones that SA has, but they still would draw in people which would "disrupt the flow of natural gameplay".
Image
Pacific (98-02) - Mystic of FL
Catskills (03-08) - Roo Avery of VIT, T^B
UOSA - Amos Trask/Roo Avery of WTC

Chad-
Posts: 459
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Chad- »

I win every tourney so my opinion should only matter. Remove tournies and Blackfoot do another pvp season.That is all.

BlackFoot
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 7668
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:33 am
Location: Canada

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by BlackFoot »

so far today we have had two events, there has been a total of 17 participants out of 300 ips in both which were removed from 'normal game play' for about a total of 20 minutes so far. Will continue to track.

(1:32:23 PM) SecondAge: 4v4 PvP Tournament is scheduled to begin in 4 minutes. (3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM)
(1:37:22 PM) SecondAge: The first tournament match starts in 12 seconds with 4 particpant(s). If you are entered, you will be pulled.
(1:38:58 PM) SecondAge: The tournament is now over. The winners were: Luigi, Fortune Favors, Chad, Martin X

10 more players out of the real world for 5 minutes. out of 350 ips.


(1:39:40 PM) SecondAge: Signups for 2 vs 2 Tournament have Opened
(1:44:52 PM) SecondAge: The first tournament match starts in 12 seconds with 9 particpant(s). If you are entered, you will be pulled. (i went to that one lots of one player teams :P)
been twenty mins waiting for the end of this one chad treemeister luige and oforutne favours been goin at it along time. So 4 guys out of the world for about 30 minutes. No one watching really.

15 players out of the real world out of 350 ips. for twenty minutes + 4 guys. Will keep trackign todays activity.

9 or 10 hours later another event

[22:30] <@SecondAge> The first tournament match starts in 12 seconds with 24 particpant(s). If you are entered, you will be pulled.
[22:22] <@SecondAge> Server: RunUO 2.0 Creatures: 100815 Items: 4161106 Guilds: 800 Clients Online: 681 IP's: 406

so at this event there is about 30 clients (about 25 players) a few newbs coming and going through the event gates.
25 minutes later about half the players have left the event area so theres about 15 players still here.

[23:03] <@SecondAge> The tournament is now over. The winner was: Treemeister

so about 15 people it took them for 15 minutes out of the real map and it took 15 players off the map for a half hour.

If you actually look at the amount of people participating in these events versus the amount of players online it is not a compelling argument that it is draining the world of players. Rarely did that ratio go anywhere near 1/20 players at an event compared to playing in 'the real world' (by ip). The length of the events that all of these players are 'drained' from the world is also short.
Last edited by BlackFoot on Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:10 am, edited 6 times in total.
Image
<IronfistMax> tell me where you are in game, and ill come thank you personally
Mad_Max: blackfoot you sent everyone to a slaughter
<Derrick> We will not negotiate with terrorists.
UOSA Society of Adventure and History [UoH]

Vlastslav
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:39 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Vlastslav »

Chad- wrote:I win every tourney so my opinion should only matter. Remove tournies and Blackfoot do another pvp season.That is all.
Spanky wins too when he plays, its good to see you want them removed.

Cataclyst
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:18 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Cataclyst »

no he doesn't :(.

Chad wants them removed because he doesn't care about trophies, he's given away like 3452543543 points, and just sold like 96 silver coins for 100k.

afaiac your arguement still sucks.
(10:15:37 AM) mark: wana pk?
(10:15:41 AM) Cataclysm: all mine are dead, sigh
(10:15:44 AM) Cataclysm: thank weezy for one, spanky for the other
(10:15:49 AM) Cataclysm: and a dc for the third
(10:15:57 AM) mark: why u shouldnt team with ethnics

Vlastslav
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:39 pm

Re: SHOULD EVENTS BE REMOVED OR LIMITED

Post by Vlastslav »

Im glad your the guild cheerleader, but im sure people can speak for themselves. You don't even know what the argument is, as you've stated previously in this thread.

Post Reply