Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

For ideas on how to make Second Age a better shard. Can it get any better? Maybe.
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
User avatar
Boomland Jenkins
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:00 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Boomland Jenkins »

MatronDeWinter wrote:Are blessed items breakable yet? It's been several years since we learned through research (demo testing and UO patch notes) that these items should become breakable. Certainly this change has been added by now.
Blessed items are breakable here if they were blessed from the patch that was put into effect several years ago. UOSA has many grandfathered items as you know. Items that Derrick told players would be unbreakable will remain unbreakable, simple as that.
Eat. Sleep. Ultima.

User avatar
Soma
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:40 pm

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Soma »

*Rubs unbreakable sandals*

Ooh baby that feels good.
Please choose a more appropriate signature.

iamreallysquall
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by iamreallysquall »

Anarcho wrote:
Ohm wrote:They should not break because they have been grandfathered in.
It is not a typical grandfathering, though.

In this case, we have actually added a mechanic/new state for these items. "Super blessed", if you will. I can go into more depth on this if you like.

The reason these items have never been affected is because Derrick told the original purchasers that they would never break. I have discussed this with Derrick a number of times and he would like to keep his word on this matter.
^ this and you know that fix was "for now" as per derrick im pretty sure you have all milked your unbreakable items for the worth of the original silver and then some like get real already and get over it. reset the damage fucking damage and let em break
<mistercherry> i bet ide beat yer asss in scrabble
<Atraxi> as soon as i find the noobs i stole from
<Jamison> lelouche your taunts will be your downfall

User avatar
Soma
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:40 pm

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Soma »

99% hating on the 1%

stop class warfare plz
Please choose a more appropriate signature.

User avatar
MatronDeWinter
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 7248
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:35 am
Location: 你的錢包

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by MatronDeWinter »

for now

Ohm
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 977
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:00 am

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Ohm »

Anarcho wrote:
The reason these items have never been affected is because Derrick told the original purchasers that they would never break. I have discussed this with Derrick a number of times and he would like to keep his word on this matter.
[22:31:51] <wintergate> Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

Image

Nickodemuse
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:56 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Nickodemuse »

all you players with gf'd blessed items, do you! Im still gonna sport my GF'd dyed death robe. Dont get jelly!

User avatar
MatronDeWinter
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 7248
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:35 am
Location: 你的錢包

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by MatronDeWinter »

Ohm wrote:
Anarcho wrote:
The reason these items have never been affected is because Derrick told the original purchasers that they would never break. I have discussed this with Derrick a number of times and he would like to keep his word on this matter.

Code: Select all

for now
His words are in the patch note that made the change.

Here's for a more breakable-masky future in Q3 '15 !!

User avatar
Soma
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:40 pm

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Soma »

Please choose a more appropriate signature.

User avatar
Boomland Jenkins
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:00 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Boomland Jenkins »

MatronDeWinter wrote:
Ohm wrote:
Anarcho wrote:
The reason these items have never been affected is because Derrick told the original purchasers that they would never break. I have discussed this with Derrick a number of times and he would like to keep his word on this matter.

Code: Select all

for now
His words are in the patch note that made the change.

Here's for a more breakable-masky future in Q3 '15 !!

And that's how they shall remain, for now. And it's always now.
Eat. Sleep. Ultima.

User avatar
MatronDeWinter
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 7248
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:35 am
Location: 你的錢包

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by MatronDeWinter »

We have arrived at a different instance of "now". Have you reconsidered this mechanic?

Hicha
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2264
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:03 am
Location: out selling permits

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by Hicha »

I woke up this morning with this sense telling me to check these forums, and what do you know, it's been exactly 6 years ago when we learned through research (both demo testing and UO patch notes) that all blessed items should become breakable, specifically grandfathered items.

Certainly this change has been added by now as we all know UO:T2A thrives on era accuracy...
Image
"I consider most of you NPC's that inhabit the single player game that I am here to enjoy." - MatronDeWinter

User avatar
TacoSupreme
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2017 11:16 am

Re: Blessed Items should break from damage REDUX!

Post by TacoSupreme »

This needs to be done if it hasn't been. Now is the best time with the population down so much, think of it as a starting over.

Most of the loudmouths who fought against this because of > muh pixels are gone now. Time to be era accurate.

Post Reply