UO Second Age

I guess according to some of the limp-wristed crybabies in this thread we are supposed to respond to every hostile ragequit post with nothing but endearment and apologetics.

Alas, 'twasn't me.

What was this guy's character name? I've been townkilling/drylooting (trashing all the loot of course, including gold/regs) around here for the past couple days and wonder if it was my handiwork.

Someone talked sh*t to you in game, welcome to UO. Stop trying to make a federal case out of it.

OMG you're seriously nerdraging over yo mamma/yo daddy insults?

Volga wrote:including racist and homophobic comments

So sensitive. What a wuss.

Freight Elevator wrote:

Pac wrote: I know of multiple UO servers out there with way more clients on than dead-UOSA's shameful '200 client' count.

People saying this would "kill the shard" - you don't get it, the shard is already dead.

You know all 2 of them?

Current active players on UOSA? Yes, sadly.

If you want to see this server die, and that other server that shall not be named, become the only UO server with more than 200 clients on it...than sure, rock it out. Derrek already said when I started playing here in 2010, that no chars, no items, no houses would be wipe.....ever....I expect him ...

Best possible thing that could happen to this shard. After 6 years a refresh is needed.

And the crotchety old pixel coveters who will allegedly quit because of it would only server to better the shard with their departure.

I'm waiting for a denier to blame it on Winter.

Freeza wrote:Shard wipe, limit of 1 account per IP, block razor - no 3rd party programs allowed to be used.

DO IT!

The only good thing that could possibly be done with this shard at this point. The mess is too big to simply clean up.

Gone forever just as it should be.

Shard is in its death throes. Nothing can really be done about it at this point.

lol, so sad

If this is proven to be era-accurate then it goes in the game, period. This isn't subjective.