2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enough?
Forum rules
Please if you haven't, make an account on myUOSA: http://my.uosecondage.com and Submit some pics!
You can also associate images with your character pages there.
Please if you haven't, make an account on myUOSA: http://my.uosecondage.com and Submit some pics!
You can also associate images with your character pages there.
Re: 2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enoug
uhh.. what?
[22:31:51] <wintergate> Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Re: 2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enoug
If those are all RIDEABLE llamas, then Im impressed.
GO SKINS
Catskills 1997-2002ish
Catskills 1997-2002ish
Re: 2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enoug
Menkaure did u miss this?Menkaure wrote:If those are all RIDEABLE llamas, then Im impressed.
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=56393
Lankgord: Hello. I'm New To The Server. Any Drama Going On Lately?
[20:38] <newYorK>i love how franz is in game robbing me while im reading his comic
[20:38] <newYorK> priceless
[20:38] <newYorK>i love how franz is in game robbing me while im reading his comic
[20:38] <newYorK> priceless
Re: 2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enoug
I just hope it was one of your alt for the occasion of this draw .... and to let know to all of you, i was bought all the llamas at 500 gp per and will continue to make those pretty furred mounts at 500 gp per! all other prices, even for the fun of someone, are scammish way to laugh ! When not deciding to have the fun to make everyone ride a llama and give them for free like on the time if this one, what i have done too!
Re: 2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enoug
Jakob wrote:Menkaure did u miss this?Menkaure wrote:If those are all RIDEABLE llamas, then Im impressed.
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=56393
Haha thank you for alerting me to that
GO SKINS
Catskills 1997-2002ish
Catskills 1997-2002ish
Re: 2 is always better than 1 ! why to bother with not enoug
from now, i call you watson for your deductive conclusions, azheman!